Literature DB >> 6468778

A comparative study of hearing screening procedures.

R E FitzZaland, G D Zink.   

Abstract

Three thousand, five hundred and ten children were screened with three pure-tone and two immittance techniques. All children in the study received follow-up audiological and medical examination within 2 days of the screening. Procedures, equipment, personnel, and environmental variables were controlled. The efficiency of the screening procedures is compared and the requirements for cost efficient and effective hearing screening are recommended. Reported is an indication of an optimal range of false positives emanating from a screening program and appropriate validators for auditory screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6468778     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-198407000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  3 in total

1.  Teleaudiometry as a screening method in school children.

Authors:  Maine Botasso; Seisse Gabriela Gandolfi Sanches; Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Alessandra Giannella Samelli
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.365

2.  A Mobile Phone-Based Approach for Hearing Screening of School-Age Children: Cross-Sectional Validation Study.

Authors:  Yuan-Chia Chu; Yen-Fu Cheng; Feipei Lai; Ying-Hui Lai; Yu Tsao; Tzong-Yang Tu; Shuenn Tsong Young; Tzer-Shyong Chen; Yu-Fang Chung; Wen-Huei Liao
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.773

3.  Hearing Norton Sound: a community randomised trial protocol to address childhood hearing loss in rural Alaska.

Authors:  Susan D Emmett; Samantha Kleindienst Robler; Nae-Yuh Wang; Alain Labrique; Joseph J Gallo; Philip Hofstetter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.