| Literature DB >> 6467232 |
P Fessenden, E R Lee, T V Samulski.
Abstract
Hyperthermia has little hope of progressing as a clinical modality without accurate assessment of the temperature distributions obtained. At the present time only direct, invasive temperature-measuring techniques are possible, posing severe limitations. Established techniques for clinical temperature measurement have developed over the past few years, and for both ultrasound and electromagnetic hyperthermia it is possible to get temperature-time profiles at a large number of spatial points. Position uncertainty, thermal conduction smearing, and artifactual heating limit the accuracy to about 0.2 degrees (electromagnetic) or 0.5 degrees (ultrasound), but this is probably less of a hindrance than the inadequate percentage of tumor and normal tissue volume for which achieved temperatures can be documented.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1984 PMID: 6467232
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Res ISSN: 0008-5472 Impact factor: 12.701