Literature DB >> 6466062

Spinal fractures: results and experience with computer tomography.

W Crone-Münzebrock, H H Jend, M Heller, H Schöttle.   

Abstract

Our results and experience with computer tomography (CT) were analyzed with respect to 41 patients with fresh bone injuries in both the cervicothoracic and the lumbar region of the vertebral column. Besides differentiated representation of the involvement of various parts of the vertebral body, the arch, transverse and spinous processes in 46 fractures, and four luxation fractures, bone fragments were found in the spinal cavity in 12 patients. Two patients displayed spinal bleeding and 3 showed a traumatic vertebral disc protrusion; 5 patients had paravertebral hematomas. Comparison of the CT-verified computer-tomographic fractures with the results of conventional X-ray diagnosis in two planes, as well as partial a.p. or lateral tomography (n = 12), revealed that in 13 patients even the detection of the fracture remained uncertain. Post-traumatic CT investigation (n = 9) showed syringomyelia in 3 patients, dense necrosis in 1 patient, and spinal channel stenoses as well as radicular irritations which could be explained by overshoot bone neogenesis at the intervertebral foramina. New technological developments in CT instruments of the most recent generation (digital radiography, sagittal and coronary image reconstruction) have made CT the most effective method in the diagnosis of spinal trauma. This necessitates a reorientation in the diagnostic procedure in patients with traumatic lesions of the spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6466062     DOI: 10.1007/bf00451316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0344-8444


  31 in total

Review 1.  Transverse axial tomography of the spine.

Authors:  F P Gargano
Journal:  CRC Crit Rev Clin Radiol Nucl Med       Date:  1976-12

2.  CT diagnosis of spinal epidural hematoma.

Authors:  M J Post; D S Seminer; R M Quencer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1982 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Computed tomography in the diagnosis of an atlas fracture.

Authors:  M S Kershner; G A Goodman; G S Perlmutter
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Computed tomography of spinal fractures.

Authors:  S F Handel; Y Y Lee
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Computerized tomographic assessment of the traumatized dorsolumbar spine before and after Harrington instrumentation.

Authors:  R R White; A Newberg; D Seligson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Correction of spinal instability and recovery of neurologic loss following cervical vertebral body replacement. A case report.

Authors:  T R Light; F C Wagner; R M Johnson; W O Southwick
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The value of computed tomography in spinal trauma.

Authors:  M J Post; B A Green; R M Quencer; N A Stokes; R A Callahan; F J Eismont
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Computed tomography of spinal fractures.

Authors:  E N Faerber; S M Wolpert; R M Scott; S C Belkin; B L Carter
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Computed tomographic evaluation of traumatic spinal injuries.

Authors:  R Tadmor; K R Davis; G H Roberson; P F New; J M Taveras
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  [Computer tomographic diagnosis of spinal injuries].

Authors:  J Treisch; C Claussen
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1983-05
View more
  1 in total

1.  The impact of magnetic resonance on the diagnostic evaluation of acute cervicothoracic spinal trauma.

Authors:  A L Goldberg; W E Rothfus; Z L Deeb; R H Daffner; A R Lupetin; J E Wilberger; E R Prostko
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.199

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.