Literature DB >> 6463677

Psychological side-effects of the mass screening on cervical cancer.

N F Reelick, W F de Haes, J H Schuurman.   

Abstract

The results are reported of a study on the psychological side-effects of mass screening for cervical cancer in Rotterdam. The reactions of participants towards a positive smear and towards the treatment which followed the positive smear were analysed. Women who had problems with a positive smear and with a serious disorder which necessitated an operation and hospitalization had problems with the treatment. However, most women who underwent the operation did not have lasting problems of either a psychological or somatic nature. Women who had been treated by their G.P.s or by a gynaecologist in most cases did not have problems with their treatment. The final conclusion was that mass screening for cervical cancer in Rotterdam caused psychological side-effects to occur among women with a positive smear. However, for the majority of women with a positive smear they were not of a lasting or serious nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6463677     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90169-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  5 in total

Review 1.  Psychological costs of screening.

Authors:  T M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-26

Review 2.  Is default from colposcopy a problem, and if so what can we do? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  H Lester; S Wilson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  From human papillomavirus (HPV) to cervical cancer: psychosocial processes in infection, detection, and control.

Authors:  S M Miller; W Mischel; A O'Leary; M Mills
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1996

4.  The gynecologic oncology consult: symptom presentation and concurrent symptoms of depression and anxiety.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Fowler; Kristen M Carpenter; Parul Gupta; Deanna M Golden-Kreutz; Barbara L Andersen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Does population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis raise anxiety among those tested? Findings from a population based chlamydia screening study.

Authors:  Rona Campbell; Nicola Mills; Emma Sanford; Anna Graham; Nicola Low; Tim J Peters
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.