Literature DB >> 646359

Bacteria isolated from the duodenum, ileum, and cecum of young chicks.

J P Salanitro, I G Blake, P A Muirehead, M Maglio, J R Goodman.   

Abstract

Facultatively anaerobic and strictly anaerobic bacteria colonizing the intestinal tracts of 14-day-old chicks fed a corn-based diet were enumerated, isolated, and identified. Colony counts from anaerobic roll tubes (rumen fluid medium) or aerobic plates (brain heart infusion agar) recovered from homogenates of the duodenum, upper and lower ileum, and cecum varied appreciably among samples from individual birds. Anaerobic and aerobic counts from the duodenum and ileum were similar. Anaerobic counts were highest from the cecum (0.7 X 10(11) to 1.6 X 10(11)/g of dry tissue) and exceeded aerobic plate counts by a factor of at least 10(2). Facultatively anaerobic groups (Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Lactobacillus, and Escherichia coli) comprised the predominant flora of the duodenum and ileum, although large numbers of anaerobes (9 to 39% of the small intestine isolates), represented by species of Eubacterium, Propionibacterium, Clostridium, Gemmiger, and Fusobacterium, were also recovered. Strict anaerobes (anaerobic gram-positive cocci, Eubacterium, Clostridium Gemmiger, Fusobacterium, and Bacteriodes) made up nearly the entire microbial population of the cecum. Scanning electron microscopy of the intestinal epithelia of chicks revealed populations of microbes on the duodenal, ileal, and cecal mucosal surfaces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 646359      PMCID: PMC242923          DOI: 10.1128/aem.35.4.782-790.1978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  23 in total

1.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTESTINAL FLORA OF THE YOUNG CHICK.

Authors:  C N HUHTANEN; J M PENSACK
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Isolation, culture characteristics, and identification of anaerobic bacteria from the chicken cecum.

Authors:  J P Salanitro; I G Fairchilds; Y D Zgornicki
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-04

3.  Evaluation of the redesigned enterotube--a system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  K M Tomfohrde; D L Rhoden; P B Smith; A Balows
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-02

4.  Presumptive identification of group A, B, and D streptococci.

Authors:  R R Facklam; J F Padula; L G Thacker; E C Wortham; B J Sconyers
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-01

5.  The development of the flora of the alimentary tract in young animals.

Authors:  H W Smith
Journal:  J Pathol Bacteriol       Date:  1965-10

Review 6.  Lactobacilli which attach to the crop epithelium of the fowl.

Authors:  R Fuller; B E Brooker
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Adhesion of Lactobacilli to the chicken crop epithelium.

Authors:  B E Brooker; R Fuller
Journal:  J Ultrastruct Res       Date:  1975-07

8.  Distribution of indigenous bacteria in the digestive tract of conventional and gnotobiotic rats.

Authors:  M Morotomi; T Watanabe; N Suegara; Y Kawai; M Mutai
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Preservation of gastrointestinal bacteria and their microenvironmental associations in rats by freezing.

Authors:  C P Davis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Studies on the cecal microflora of commercial broiler chickens.

Authors:  J P Salanitro; I G Blake; P A Muirhead
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-09
View more
  17 in total

1.  Quantitative determination of bile salt hydrolase activity in bacteria isolated from the small intestine of chickens.

Authors:  Ane Knarreborg; Ricarda M Engberg; Søren K Jensen; Bent B Jensen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  In vitro appraisal of the probiotic value of intestinal lactobacilli.

Authors:  L Vandevoorde; H Christiaens; W Verstraete
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Subtherapeutic levels of antibiotics in poultry feeds and their effects on weight gain, feed efficiency, and bacterial cholyltaurine hydrolase activity.

Authors:  S D Feighner; M P Dashkevicz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Comparison of media for isolation of poultry intestinal bacteria.

Authors:  R W Kelley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Adherent bacterial populations on the bovine rumen wall: distribution patterns of adherent bacteria.

Authors:  R P McCowan; K J Cheng; J W Costerton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Effect of dietary carbohydrates on bacterial cholyltaurine hydrolase in poultry intestinal homogenates.

Authors:  S D Feighner; M P Dashkevicz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Effects of dietary fat source and subtherapeutic levels of antibiotic on the bacterial community in the ileum of broiler chickens at various ages.

Authors:  Ane Knarreborg; Mary Alice Simon; Ricarda M Engberg; Bent Borg Jensen; Gerald W Tannock
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Development of a differential medium for bile salt hydrolase-active Lactobacillus spp.

Authors:  M P Dashkevicz; S D Feighner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Effective recovery of bacterial DNA and percent-guanine-plus-cytosine-based analysis of community structure in the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens.

Authors:  J H Apajalahti; L K Särkilahti; B R Mäki; J P Heikkinen; P H Nurminen; W E Holben
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Correlation coefficients between different methods of expressing bacterial quantification using real time PCR.

Authors:  Bahman Navidshad; Juan Boo Liang; Mohammad Faseleh Jahromi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 6.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.