Literature DB >> 645995

A method for selecting criteria to evaluate medical care.

E H Wagner, C A Williams, R Greenberg, D Kleinbaum, S Wolf, M A Ibrahim.   

Abstract

This study tests a questionnaire method for eliciting process criteria for medical care appraisal. The questionnaire was sent to national samples of family physicians, pediatricians, and pediatricians specializing in infectious diseases asking their opinions about various clinical actions in 125 clinical situations concerning respiratory infection in infants. Five hundred twenty-four (54%) physicians returned completed questionnaires. Questionnaire responses favored the performance of a majority of actions and opposed very few. Opinions concerning individual actions, particularly diagnostic tests and treatments, varied widely depending upon the clinical situation presented. A second questionnaire sent one year later indicated that the opinions expressed in the first questionnaire remained stable over time, especially if the initial opinion favored performance of the action. Comparison of the questionnaire responses and medical records of a group of practitioners demonstrated that only 55% of actions favored in a practitioner's questionnaire appeared in his records. Although the questionnaire method appears to be a feasible, specific, and reliable means of identifying clinical opinion, there remains considerable discordance between opinion as expressed in the questionnaire and recorded clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 645995      PMCID: PMC1653894          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.68.5.464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  7 in total

1.  Peer review by criteria mapping: criteria for diabetes mellitus. The use of decision-making in chart audit.

Authors:  S Greenfield; C E Lewis; S H Kaplan; M B Davidson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  A limitation in the use of office records for health care evaluation.

Authors:  T Long; K D Rogers
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Office records in the evaluation of quality of care.

Authors:  H C Thompson; C E Osborne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The comparison of percentages in matched samples.

Authors:  W G COCHRAN
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1950-12       Impact factor: 2.445

5.  Quality-of-care assessment: choosing a method for peer review.

Authors:  R H Brook; F A Appel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-06-21       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Influence of training and experience on selecting criteria to evaluate medical care.

Authors:  E H Wagner; R A Greenberg; P B Imrey; C A Williams; S H Wolf; M A Ibrahim
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-04-15       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Quality assessment in hypertension: analysis of process and outcome methods.

Authors:  F T Nobrega; G W Morrow; R K Smoldt; K P Offord
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  The quality of care is related to death rates: hospital inpatient management of infants with acute gastroenteritis in Jamaica.

Authors:  G J Walker; D E Ashley; R J Hayes
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Developing criteria for quality of assessment: effect of the Delphi technique.

Authors:  F J Romm; B S Hulka
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Studying patterns of cancer care: how useful is the medical record?

Authors:  P Feigl; G Glaefke; L Ford; P Diehr; J Chu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 9.308

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.