Literature DB >> 6459734

Electrocardiographic observations in severe aortic valve stenosis: correlative necropsy study to clinical, hemodynamic,, and ECG variables demonstrating relation of 12-lead QRS amplitude to peak systolic transaortic pressure gradient.

R J Siegel, W C Roberts.   

Abstract

Most ECG studies in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS) have involved living patients in whom the status of the left ventricular (LV) myocardium, epicardial coronary arteries, and mitral valve was not precisely known. We examined the 12-lead ECG recorded within 2 months of death in 50 patients aged 16 to 65 years (mean 48) with peak systolic pressure gradients (PSPG) across the aortic valve ranging from 52 to 180 mm Hg (mean 98) and anatomically normal mitral valves. Excluding four patients with complete left bundle branch block (LBBB), 44 (96%) of the other 46 patients had the usual voltage criteria for LV hypertrophy (LVH). Measurement of the total 12-lead QRS amplitude, which ranged from 144 to 417 mm (10 mm = 1 mV), (mean 257) proved useful for it correlated directly with PSPG across the aortic valve and, when the four LBBB patients were excluded, with the peak LV systolic pressure. The total 12-lead QRS amplitude (mm) was similar in most patients to the LV systolic pressure (mm Hg). Thus, subtraction of the indirect systemic arterial systolic pressure (mm Hg) from the total 12-lead QRS amplitude (mm) provides a reasonable noninvasive prediction of the PSPG across the aortic valve in patients with moderate to severe AS. Additionally, the mean of the total 12-lead QRS amplitude was significantly (p less than 0.05) greater in the 11 younger (less than or equal to 40 years) than in the 39 older patients (278 mm vs 257 mm), in the 14 women than in the 36 men (277 mm vs 240 mm), in the 22 patients with heavier (greater than 600 gm) hearts (274 mm vs 244 mm), in the 34 patients without compared to the 16 with significant coronary arterial narrowing (270 mm vs 238 mm), and in the 22 patients without compared to the 24 with ECG myocardial damage patterns (269 mm vs 236 mm).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6459734     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(82)90494-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  14 in total

1.  Two causes in one patient for extremely low voltage on the electrocardiogram.

Authors:  William C Roberts; Melody Joy Sherwood; Paul A Grayburn
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2017-04

2.  William Clifford Roberts, MD: an interview by W. Bruce Fye, MD.

Authors:  William C Roberts; W Bruce Fye
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2007-07

3.  Usefulness of Total 12-Lead QRS Voltage as a Clue to Diagnosis of Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis Severe Enough to Warrant Orthotopic Heart Transplant.

Authors:  William C Roberts; Tiffany M Becker; Shelley A Hall
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 14.676

4.  Association of African Ancestry With Electrocardiographic Voltage and Concentric Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The Dallas Heart Study.

Authors:  Aya J Alame; Sonia Garg; Julia Kozlitina; Colby Ayers; Ronald M Peshock; Susan A Matulevicius; Mark H Drazner
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 14.676

5.  Evaluation of systolic murmurs by Doppler ultrasonography.

Authors:  A Hoffmann; D Burckhardt
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1983-10

6.  Non-invasive evaluation of the myocardial substrate of cardiac amyloidosis by gadolinium cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  E Perugini; C Rapezzi; T Piva; O Leone; L Bacchi-Reggiani; L Riva; F Salvi; L Lovato; A Branzi; R Fattori
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Gender differences in factors influencing electrocardiographic findings of left ventricular hypertrophy in severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Shinji Satoh; Soichiro Omura; Hiroko Inoue; Emiko Ejima; Koutatsu Shimozono; Makiko Hayashi; Takahiro Mori; Katsuhiko Takenaka; Natsumi Kawamura; Kotaro Numaguchi; Etsuo Mori; Akemi Asoh; Toshihiro Nakamura; Koji Hiyamuta
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Electrocardiographic amplitudes: a new risk factor for sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ingegerd Ostman-Smith; Aase Wisten; Eva Nylander; Ewa-Lena Bratt; Anne de-Wahl Granelli; Abderrahim Oulhaj; Erik Ljungström
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Office and Home Blood Pressures as Determinants of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Among Black Nigerians Compared With White Flemish.

Authors:  Augustine N Odili; Lutgarde Thijs; Wen-Yi Yang; John O Ogedengbe; Maxwell M Nwegbu; Lotte Jacobs; Fang-Fei Wei; Ying-Mei Feng; Zhen-Yu Zhang; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Tim S Nawrot; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.689

10.  Heritabilities, proportions of heritabilities explained by GWAS findings, and implications of cross-phenotype effects on PR interval.

Authors:  Claudia Tamar Silva; Jan A Kors; Najaf Amin; Abbas Dehghan; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Rob Willemsen; Ben A Oostra; Cornelia M van Duijn; Aaron Isaacs
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.