Literature DB >> 6459389

A turbidimetric study of the responses of selected strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to eight antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotics.

D Greenwood, A Eley.   

Abstract

Turbidimetric and morphologic responses to eight antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotics were compared for selected strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with different susceptibilities to carbenicillin. In conventional minimal inhibitory concentration tests, all of the newer antibiotics appeared more active than carbenicillin, and apalcillin and cefsulodin had the greatest overall activity. However, in turbidimetric tests the activity of apalcillin and three other N-acyl penicillins (azlocillin, mezlocillin, and piperacillin) was inferior to that of carbenicillin and the other agents. The N-acyl penicillins were also all susceptible to intrinsic pseudomonal beta-lactamase, so that dense bacterial populations inactivated these antibiotics in concentrations of greater 128 micrograms/ml during overnight incubation. Against carbenicillin-resistant strains, carbenicillin, ticarcillin, and sulbenicillin were the least active antibiotics, and cefsulodin had the best overall activity. Turbidimetric monitoring highlights the problems of interpreting the results of conventional minimal inhibitory concentration tests, particularly when large inocula are involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6459389     DOI: 10.1093/infdis/145.1.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  8 in total

Review 1.  The penicillins today.

Authors:  R Finch
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-05-19

2.  Postantibiotic and bactericidal effect of imipenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  I Odenholt; B Isaksson; L Nilsson; O Cars
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Correlation between growth curve and killing curve of Escherichia coli after a brief exposure to suprainhibitory concentrations of ampicillin and piperacillin.

Authors:  E Yourassowsky; M P Van der Linden; M J Lismont; F Crokaert; Y Glupczynski
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of apalcillin and piperacillin.

Authors:  H Lode; A Elvers; P Koeppe; K Borner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Use of ureidopenicillins for selection of plasmid vector transformants in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas putida.

Authors:  D L Day; D Yasinow; J McDonough; C W Shuster
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Inoculum effect of new beta-lactam antibiotics on Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  R H Eng; S M Smith; C Cherubin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Penicillins. A current review of their clinical pharmacology and therapeutic use.

Authors:  Dilip Nathwani; Martin J Wood
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  [Cefsulodin in the treatment of Pseudomonas meningitis].

Authors:  O Brückner; H Collmann; M Trautmann
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1983 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.553

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.