Literature DB >> 6457316

Radiological evaluation of painful total hip replacement.

J Tehranzadeh, R Schneider, R H Freiberger.   

Abstract

Ninety-four cases of clinically failed, cemented, total hip prostheses requiring surgery were reviewed to determine the accuracy of preoperative plain radiography, culture of aspirated fluid, arthrography, and bone scanning. When radiopaque cement had been used to embed the prosthesis, plain radiography was highly accurate in detecting a loose femoral component, less so in detecting a loose acetabular component. Culture of aspirated fluid was accurate in diagnosing infection. A positive arthrogram identified loosening with good accuracy; however, a negative arthrogram did not reliably exclude loosening. 99mTc bone scans frequently differentiated loosening from loosening with infection. The suggested sequence of diagnostic tests is plain radiography followed by bone scanning. If the bone scan shows diffuse augmented uptake, culture of aspirated fluid followed by arthrography is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6457316     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.141.2.6457316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

1.  Role of routine percutaneous hip aspirations prior to prosthesis revision.

Authors:  E S Gould; H G Potter; S E Bober
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Arthrography of painful hips following arthroplasty: digital versus plain film subtraction.

Authors:  C W Walker; R L FitzRandolph; D N Collins; G V Dalrymple
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Loosening 5 years after total hip replacement--a radiological study of the McKee-Farrar and Charnley prostheses.

Authors:  K Djerf; O Wahlström; S Hammerby
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1986

4.  Contrast and nuclear arthrography in loosening of the uncemented hip prosthesis.

Authors:  J S Swan; E M Braunstein; H N Wellman; W Capello
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  [Imaging of hip joint arthroplasty].

Authors:  M E Mayerhoefer; J Frühwald-Pallamar; C Czerny
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Ultrasonography after hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  K Földes; M Gaal; P Balint; K Nemenyi; C Kiss; G P Balint; W W Buchanan
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.199

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.