Literature DB >> 6456884

Worldwide clinical experience with cefoperazone.

A U Gerber, W A Craig.   

Abstract

The safety and clinical efficacy of cefoperazone 1 to 2g 12-hourly was evaluated in clinical trials conducted in the United States, Europe, South and Latin America, and Japan. 1046 patients were treated in 4 comparative and 9 non-comparative studies. An overall satisfactory clinical response for cefoperazone therapy was achieved in 540 (88%) of the 615 evaluable patients. Cefoperazone was effective in 92% of lower respiratory tract infections, 81% of urinary tract infections, 98% of gynaecological infections and 90% of a mixture of intra-abdominal, wound and soft tissue infections. A satisfactory clinical response was obtained in over 90% of patients infected with organisms normally susceptible to cephalosporins, such as staphylococci, streptococci, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella and Proteus species. 50 to 90% of infections caused by organisms resistant to presently available cephalosporins, such as Enterobacter species, Proteus vulgaris, Providencia species, Morganella morganii, Serratia species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Bacteroides fragilis responded satisfactorily to cefoperazone. In the 4 clinical trials comparing cefoperazone with cefamandole, cephazolin or carbenicillin, cefoperazone therapy resulted in a similar or higher rate of satisfactory clinical response. Adverse reactions related to cefoperazone occurred in 8% of patients and were mainly diarrhoea (4%), skin reactions (3%) and phlebitis (1%). Twice daily dosing with cefoperazone appears to be effective against numerous Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in a variety of clinical infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6456884     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198100221-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  7 in total

Review 1.  Protein binding of antimicrobials: clinical pharmacokinetic and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  W A Craig; P G Welling
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1977 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Postantibiotic suppression of bacterial growth.

Authors:  R W Bundtzen; A U Gerber; D L Cohn; W A Craig
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb

3.  Clinical trials with cefoperazone in the field of surgery in Japan.

Authors:  K Shibata
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.393

4.  Clinical trials with cefoperazone in the field of internal medicine in Japan.

Authors:  K Mashimo; O Kunii
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.393

5.  Single-dose pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone following intravenous administration.

Authors:  W A Craig
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.393

6.  Susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria to cefoperazone and other antibiotics.

Authors:  D Kaye; W Kobasa; K Kaye
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Clinical comparison of cefoperazone in complicated urinary tract infections using a double-blind method.

Authors:  T Nishiura
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.393

  7 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  "It Takes a Village": Mechanisms Underlying Antimicrobial Recalcitrance of Polymicrobial Biofilms.

Authors:  Giulia Orazi; George A O'Toole
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  In vitro susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolates to cefotaxime, moxalactam, and cefoperazone.

Authors:  R A Greenfield; T A Kurzynski; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Treatment of respiratory tract infections with cephalosporin antibiotics.

Authors:  R Finch
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Correlation between in vitro and in vivo activity of antimicrobial agents against gram-negative bacilli in a murine infection model.

Authors:  B Fantin; J Leggett; S Ebert; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pharmacokinetic evaluation of cefoperazone in infants.

Authors:  M Varghese; A J Khan; K Kumar; W Rosenfeld; H A Schaeffer; H E Evans
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Cefoperazone: A review of its in vitro antimicrobial activity, pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  R N Brogden; A Carmine; R C Heel; P A Morley; T M Speight; G S Avery
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 9.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.