Literature DB >> 6456101

The present status of spinal fusion in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral joint disorders.

H F Farfan, W H Kirkaldy-Willis.   

Abstract

Every type of fusion has its enthusiastic supporters. Unfortunately, the literature includes comparative analyses of various fusion procedures. Much of the effort spent in the clinical assessment of spinal fusion must be reinvested; neither the indications for diskectomy nor spinal fusion have been sufficiently clear-cut and accurately recorded. Moreover, spinal fusions often have not been applied to treat the disorder or to correct the deformity. It is essential at the outset to establish the mechanical fault; this is achieved only by a thorough understanding of the underlying pathologic lesion. Diagnosis follows a careful history and physical examination assisted by plain radiographs, lateral radiographs in flexion and extension, radiographs (anteroposterior in left and right lateral bending), and by information obtained from the CAT scan. We have designed a protocol for a prospective investigation wherein a specific fault with a specific etiology and pathologic anatomy is identified and submitted to a surgical procedure in a specified sequence. In future reviews, emphasis must be paid to selection of patients, the individual joint requiring stabilization and the type of fusion performed. Only then can we put this theoretically effective procedure to the acid test of objective clinical evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6456101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

1.  Spinal manipulation in the treatment of low-back pain.

Authors:  W H Kirkaldy-Willis; J D Cassidy
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Determination of safe load.

Authors:  S Gracovetsky
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1986-02

3.  Should backache be treated with spinal fusion? Spinal fusion is the only treatment for discogenic pain.

Authors:  J P O'Brien
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-06

Review 4.  Recent advances in the treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  A Nachemson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  L5 vertebrectomy for the surgical treatment of tumoral and traumatic lesions of L5 vertebra.

Authors:  Tuncay Kaner; Tunc Oktenoglu; Mehdi Sasani; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2012-02-28

6.  An International Multicenter Study Assessing the Role of Ethnicity on Variation of Lumbar Facet Joint Orientation and the Occurrence of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis in Asia Pacific: A Study from the AOSpine Asia Pacific Research Collaboration Consortium.

Authors:  Richard Williams; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Ben Goss; Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran; Yoshiharu Kawaguchi; Shankar Acharya; Mamoru Kawakami; Shigenobu Satoh; Wen-Jer Chen; Chun-Kun Park; Chong-Suh Lee; Thanit Foocharoen; Hideki Nagashima; Sunguk Kuh; Zhaomin Zheng; Richard Condor; Manabu Ito; Motoki Iwasaki; Je Hoon Jeong; Keith D K Luk; Bambang Prijambodo; Amol Rege; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Zhuojing Luo; Warat Tassanawipas; Narayana Acharya; Rohit Pokharel; Yong Shen; Takui Ito; Zhihai Zhang; Janardhana Aithala P; Gomatam Vijay Kumar; Rahyussalim Ahmad Jabir; Saumyajit Basu; Baojun Li; Vishal Moudgil; Phoebe Sham; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-07-16

7.  Efficacy of computed tomography in prediction of operability of L5/S1 foraminal stenosis using region of interest: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study.

Authors:  Dong Woo Shim; Byung Ho Lee; Jiwoon Seo; Hyunjoo Hong; Sung Chul Shin; Hak Sun Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.