Literature DB >> 6455326

The effects of lethal selection on the EST-6 to PGM region of chromosome 3 in Drosophila melanogaster.

B J Cochrane, R C Richmond.   

Abstract

A powerful means of studying the effects of selection on chromosome segments in Drosophila melanogaster has been described by Clegg et. al. (1976, 1978). This method utilizes a recessive lethal, dominant visible allele whose selection dynamics can be accurately modelled to predict the fates of nonlethal alleles at linked loci. Results of these experiments indicate that strong epistatic interactions among loci occur that effect fitnesses associated with gametic types in the basal region of chromosome 3. We have used similar methods in studying a different segment of chromosome 3, that spanned by Est-6 (3-36.8) and Pgm (3-43.4), with the aim of determining whether the results of Clegg and his colleagues could be reproduced when a different region was studied. Our experiment showed that selection did operate on a region of the chromosome marked by Pgm, but that no evidence of selection at loci marked by Est-6 was apparent. Weak evidence for epistatic interactions among loci within the marked region was also found. Three possible explanations for the discrepancies between our experiments and those of Clegg et al. are suggested. First, the geographically homogeneous origin of our populations may preclude selectively significant changes as a result of recombination. Second, the results seen by Clegg et al. may have been unique to the regions they studied, which included the basal heterochromatin of the chromosomes. Finally, the three loci employed may not adequately mark the unit of selection, so that actual departures from predictions of selective neutrality may not have been apparent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6455326      PMCID: PMC1214313     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  12 in total

1.  Allozymic and chromosomal similarity in two Drosophila species.

Authors:  H L Carson; W E Johnson; P S Nair; F M Sene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A computer model allowing maintenance of large amounts of genetic variability in mendelian populations. I. Assumptions and results for large populations.

Authors:  C Wills; J Crenshaw; J Vitale
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The unit of selection in Drosophila mercatorum. I. The interation of selection and meiosis in parthenogenetic strains.

Authors:  A R Templeton; C F Sing; B Brokaw
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Fine structure and evolution of DNA in heterochromatin.

Authors:  W J Peacock; A R Lohe; W L Gerlach; P Dunsmuir; E S Dennis; R Appels
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1978

5.  A note on the maternal effect mutants daughterless and abnormal oocyte in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A P Mange; L Sandler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A population cage test for heterosis in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  J A Sved; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Fitness of third chromosome homozygotes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Sved
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Studies of esterase 6 in Drosophila melanogaster. I. The genetics of a posttranslational modification.

Authors:  B J Cochrane; R C Richmond
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 1.890

9.  Genetic dissection of heterochromatin in Drosophila: the role of basal X heterochromatin in meiotic sex chromosome behaviour.

Authors:  M Yamamoto; G L Miklos
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1977-04-19       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Mutagenicity of 8-ethoxycaffeine in vitro. Induction of point mutations in the Salmonella/microsome test and of sister-chromatid exchanges as well as chromosomal aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO line).

Authors:  R Strobel; G Roszinsky-Köcher; G Röhrborn
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.433

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.