Literature DB >> 6455188

Influence of obstetricians' attitudes on their use of prenatal diagnosis for the detection of Down's syndrome.

A Lippman-Hand, D I Cohen.   

Abstract

Practising obstetricians were surveyed to determine the relation between their referral patterns and their knowledge and attitudes concerning prenatal diagnosis by amniocentesis for women aged 35 years and over. Although 82% had referred at least one eligible patient for prenatal diagnosis during the past year, almost none had used the available services for all appropriate patients. There was a statistically significant trend for increased referral as correct knowledge of the risks and accuracy of prenatal diagnosis increased. Moreover, a discriminant function combining risk and accuracy estimates, type and size of practice, and language distinguished the referrers from the nonreferrers (P = 0.0002), although there was considerable overlap between the physicians classified according to a high, moderate or low rate of referral. The data suggest that while knowledge and practice characteristics can distinguish obstetricians who refer patients for prenatal diagnosis from those who never do so, the frequency of referral may involve other factors, such as how physicians accept innovation and perceive risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6455188      PMCID: PMC1801901     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Med Assoc J        ISSN: 0008-4409            Impact factor:   8.262


  15 in total

1.  Advocacy and compliance in genetic screening. Behavior of physicians and clients in a voluntary program of testing for the Tay-Sachs gene.

Authors:  E Beck; S Blaichman; C R Scriver; C L Clow
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-11-28       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Screening programme for prevention of Down's syndrome.

Authors:  Z Stein; M Susser; A V Guterman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1973-02-10       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Amniocentesis, a forerunner of the genetic fix.

Authors:  A Etzioni; N Castleman
Journal:  Conn Med       Date:  1974-09

4.  Who's for amniocentesis?

Authors:  E O Polani
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1977-05-21       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Tay-Sachs screening: motives for participating and knowledge of genetics and probability.

Authors:  B Childs; L Gordis; M M Kaback; H H Kazazian
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Minimizing the risk of amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  A I Goldstein; K W Dumars
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-03-28       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Advocacy and compliance factors in a voluntary selective screening program.

Authors:  H Rothschild; F B Ivker
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 0.954

8.  Prenatal diagnosis of genetic disease in Canada: report of a collaborative study.

Authors:  N E Simpson; L Dallaire; J R Miller; L Siminovich; J L Hamerton; J Miller; C McKeen
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1976-10-23       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Preventing the birth of infants with Down's syndrome: a cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  S Hagard; F A Carter
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-03-27

10.  Down syndrome in British Columbia, 1952-73: incidence and mean maternal age.

Authors:  R B Lowry; D C Jones; D H Renwick; B K Trimble
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1976-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Screening for maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein: what about the low side?

Authors:  A Lippman; J A Evans
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1987-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Implementing research findings: who is responsible?

Authors:  I B Pless
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1982-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.