Literature DB >> 6453856

Evaluation of a postal screening questionnaire to identify the physically disabled.

H Peach, S Green, D Locker, S Darby, D L Patrick.   

Abstract

In this study a postal screening questionnaire was compared with an interviewer-administered questionnaire for identifying disabled persons living in the community. Disability was defined as difficulty with specified activities of daily living, specified medical problems which often cause disablement, and frequent use of a formal health or social service. A 91 per cent response rate to the screening questionnaire was obtained from a random sample of 793 adults in a general practice; 89 were classified as "disabled". Seventy-eight per cent of those subsequently interviewed changed their response to at least one item; this figure fell to 29 per cent when frequent use of formal services was excluded from the definition of disability. None of the persons classified as disabled from the postal survey were considered to be non-disabled after interview. Interviews with a sample of persons who did not report disability on the postal questionnaire resulted in no changes in classification. General practitioners (GPs) who completed screening questionnaires on respondents with the help of practice records were aware of only 79 of 206 disability items reported. The GPs were more aware of respondents' difficulties with activities of daily living than of their medical problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6453856     DOI: 10.3109/09638288009163986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Rehabil Med        ISSN: 0379-0797


  7 in total

1.  Improving the care of elderly people.

Authors:  M J Bendall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-22

2.  Standard assessment scales for elderly people. Recommendations of the Royal College of Physicians of London and the British Geriatrics Society.

Authors:  E J Dickinson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Preventive care of elderly people: how good is our training?

Authors:  A J Tulloch
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Prevalence of disability observed in an Oxfordshire practice.

Authors:  A J Tulloch
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1985-08

5.  A cross-cultural comparison of health status values.

Authors:  D L Patrick; Y Sittampalam; S M Somerville; W B Carter; M Bergner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Disablement and care: a comparison of patient views and general practitioner knowledge.

Authors:  D L Patrick; H Peach; I Gregg
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1982-07

7.  The use of questionnaires in the evaluation of the functional capacity in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  F Singer; G Kolarz; F Mayrhofer; O Scherak; N Thumb
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.980

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.