| Literature DB >> 6449397 |
Abstract
If sterilization is offered today to a young multipara pointing out the possibility of eventual later recanalization the most essential point lies in thorough patient information. The patient must be informed that less aggressive techniques like thermocoagulation or mechanical tubal occlusion bear a higher risk of failure and consequently eventual pregnancy 2%-4%-7%. Such failures are part of the method and must and cannot be considered malpractice. Extensive patient information about all pros and cons is the only way to avoid future problems. Spontaneous tubal recanalization has occurred and may occur to the most skilled surgeon. After twenty years of personal experience with almost all methods of laparoscopic tubal sterilization my recommendation today is: bipolar sterilization on one site of the isthmical tubal portion with division of the coagulated tissue. Even so sufficient tubal tissue should remain intact to allow eventual later recanalization. We were never disappointed with this way of proceeding and so far, contrary to all other methods, have observed no pregnancy among our patients.Entities:
Keywords: Contraception; Contraception Failure; Contraceptive Effectiveness; Evaluation; Family Planning; Female Sterilization; Gynecologic Surgery; Recanalization; Sterilization, Sexual; Tubal Occlusion; Use-effectiveness
Mesh:
Year: 1980 PMID: 6449397 DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1037236
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd ISSN: 0016-5751 Impact factor: 2.915