Literature DB >> 6448823

Results of surgical treatment of low back pain: a comparative study of the anterior and posterior approach.

N Nakano, T Tomita.   

Abstract

Comparative studies were made of 347 patients reviewed more than one year after the operation of disc excision for low back pain by either the anterior or posterior approach, many of whom also underwent inter-body vertebral fusion. In general the anterior approach proved superior to the posterior approach especially in cases of reoperation, largely because it avoided exposure of the spinal canal with the possible complication of bleeding or irritation of the nerve roots. There appeared to be no significant difference when fusion or no fusion was performed with an anterior approach, but with a posterior approach the results following fusion were superior to the nonfusion group. Consistently good results were attributed to correct patient selection rather than the choice of surgical technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6448823     DOI: 10.1007/bf00271092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  4 in total

1.  Retroperitoneal disc fenestration in low-back pain and sciatica; a preliminary report.

Authors:  L HULT
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1951

2.  Anterior disc excision and interbody spinal fusion for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  J L Goldner; J R Urbaniak; D E McCollum
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Judgment in lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  J J Gartland
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Indications for spinal fusion in lumbar diskopathy, instability and arthrosis. I. Anatomic and functional pathology and review of literature.

Authors:  P H Harmon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1964 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.176

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.