Literature DB >> 6445413

Responses of Ia and spindle group II afferents to single motor-unit contractions.

M D Binder, D G Stuart.   

Abstract

1. The responses of deefferented Ia and spindle group II afferents to electrically activated twitch contractions of randomly selected motor units of the cat tibialis posterior muscle have been studied. Each afferent was paired with from 8 to 20 of the muscle's 60 motor units, and each afferent-motor unit interaction was recorded to two muscle lengths. 2. Cross-correlation histograms were compiled for each afferent-motor unit interaction studied as well as the average twitch tension produced by the motor unit. A numerical "coupling index" was computed for the histogram distributions to quantitate the extent of mechanical coupling between the receptor and the single motor units. 3. Qualitatively, no consistent differences were noted in the responses of Ia and spindle group II afferents to single motor-unit contractions. However, Ia afferents were responsive to a higher percentage of motor units with which they were tested (89%) and, on the average, displayed a significantly larger magnitude of response (mean coupling index, 0.72 +/- 0.04 SE) than the spindle group II afferents (66% of motor units; mean coupling index, 0.51 +/- 0.03). 4. The extent to which a motor-unit contraction altered the discharge pattern of a spindle afferent was not strictly related to the amount of force generated by the unit, nor to its contraction time. 5. Muscle length exerted a strong influence on both the qualitative and quantitative features of many of the motor unit-muscle receptor interactions. 6. These results suggest that the degree of "mechanical coupling" between a receptor and a motor unit is largely dependent on anatomical arrangements and reinforce the possibility that muscle receptors generate a "sensory partitioning" of the motor-unit population within a muscle.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6445413     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1980.43.3.621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

1.  Considerations on mechanisms of focussed signal transmission in the multi-channel muscle stretch reflex system.

Authors:  U Windhorst
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1978-11-24       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Motor unit control and force fluctuation during fatigue.

Authors:  Paola Contessa; Alexander Adam; Carlo J De Luca
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-04-23

3.  Motor unit recruitment and proprioceptive feedback decrease the common drive.

Authors:  Carlo J De Luca; Jose A Gonzalez-Cueto; Paolo Bonato; Alexander Adam
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Segmental and supraspinal control of synaptic effectiveness of functionally identified muscle afferents in the cat.

Authors:  M Enríquez; I Jiménez; P Rudomin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Change in length of relaxed muscle fascicles and tendons with knee and ankle movement in humans.

Authors:  R D Herbert; A M Moseley; J E Butler; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  PAD patterns of physiologically identified afferent fibres from the medial gastrocnemius muscle.

Authors:  I Jiménez; P Rudomin; M Solodkin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Linear and nonlinear effects in the interactions of motor units and muscle spindle afferents.

Authors:  U Niemann; U Windhorst; J Meyer-Lohmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  On the specificity of sensory reinnervation of cat skeletal muscle.

Authors:  W F Collins; L M Mendell; J B Munson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Fusimotor reflexes in triceps surae muscle elicited by stretch of muscles in the contralateral hind limb of the cat.

Authors:  B Appelberg; H Johansson; P Sojka
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Influence of proprioceptive feedback on the firing rate and recruitment of motoneurons.

Authors:  C J De Luca; J C Kline
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.