Literature DB >> 6444950

Long-term follow-up of scoliosis fusion.

A Moskowitz, J H Moe, R B Winter, H Binner.   

Abstract

One hundred and ten scoliotic patients underwent correction and spine fusion by one of us (J. H. M.) at Gillette Children's Hospital between 1947 and 1957. Sixty-one of these patients were evaluated in 1977 for this follow-up study. The evaluation consisted of physical and roentgenographic examination, photographs, and a detailed psychosocial analysis. The aims of the study were to evaluate: (1) the long-term stability of the fusion; (2) the incidence and severity of low-back pain; and (3) the degree of integration of the patient into society. The results showed that a solid fusion had no significant loss of correction with time. Eighty-four per cent of the patients lost only zero to 5 degrees of correction during an average follow-up of twenty-six years. Low-back pain was found to be no more frequent than in the normal population in this age group, and there was less low-back pain than in a comparable series of scoliotic patients without fusion. There was no correlation between the occurrence of low-back pain and the length or magnitude of the fused curve or the lowest extent of the fusion. An unexpected finding was the high incidence of neck pain, the cause of which is unknown. Psychosocial analysis revealed that the patients were productive, active, stable persons who were working and contributing members of society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6444950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  24 in total

1.  Stress fracture of the hip and pubic rami after fusion to the sacrum in an adult with scoliosis: a case report.

Authors:  J A Morcuende; S Arauz; S L Weinstein
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2000

2.  Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative study of 42 adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and 24 normal adolescents.

Authors:  Akihiko Hiyama; Daisuke Sakai; Masahiko Watanabe; Hiroyuki Katoh; Masato Sato; Joji Mochida
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Restoration of thoracic kyphosis by simultaneous translation on two rods for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Clement; Edouard Chau; Anne Geoffray; Georges Suisse
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  50 years ago in CORR: The management of idiopathic scoliosis. John H. Moe MD. CORR 1957;9:169-184.

Authors:  Richard A Brand
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Walking sagittal balance correction by pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adults with fixed sagittal imbalance.

Authors:  Mitsuru Yagi; Shinjiro Kaneko; Yoshiyuki Yato; Takashi Asazuma; Masafumi Machida
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Spinal cord compression caused by the rod of a Harrington instrumentation device: a late complication in scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  A Krödel; J C Rehmet; C Hamburger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  L A Rinsky; J G Gamble
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-02

8.  [Evaluation of the sagittal profile in patients with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke type 1 following posterior correction].

Authors:  M Akbar; T Dreher; F Schwab; G Omlor; H Wang; T Bruckner; C Carstens; B Wiedenhöfer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Long-term results after Harrington instrumentation: increased translation and pain.

Authors:  M Krismer; C Wimmer; R Bauer; B Frischhut; W Kerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posteromedial translation.

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde; Christophe Vidal; Wafa Skalli; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.