Literature DB >> 6443759

A double blind, placebo controlled study of piroxicam in the management of acute musculoskeletal disorders.

P H Lacey, G D Dodd, D J Shannon.   

Abstract

General Practitioners from the United Kingdom produced data on 1,282 patients with acute soft tissue injury treated with either piroxicam (Feldene) or matching placebo for a period of up to two weeks. The dosage of piroxicam was 40 mg for the first 2 days and 20 mg daily thereafter. Clinical assessment included pain, swelling, limitation of active and passive movement and overall assessment of efficacy and toleration. Piroxicam was significantly better than placebo in improving patient signs and symptoms, and in its overall efficacy (P less than 0.001); 87% of piroxicam treated patients had excellent or good responses, compared to 53% of placebo treated patients. On analysis of four of the most commonly occurring diagnoses (injuries of ankle, knee, shoulder, back) patients with moderate or severe pain showed a significant improvement on treatment with piroxicam. Physicians' overall assessment of toleration showed no evidence of differences between treatments. Over 90% of patients in both treatment groups had good or excellent toleration. Withdrawals due to side effects were 3% and 2.5% respectively for piroxicam and placebo treated patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6443759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm        ISSN: 0140-1610


  7 in total

Review 1.  Outcome of non-invasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The course of pain and the restriction of mobility in patients with shoulder complaints in general practice.

Authors:  J C Winters; J S Sobel; K H Groenier; J H Arendzen; B Meyboom-de Jong
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 3.  Oral cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors versus other oral analgesics for acute soft tissue injury: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peter Jones; Rain Lamdin
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  A combination of systematic review and clinicians' beliefs in interventions for subacromial pain.

Authors:  Kajsa Johansson; Birgitta Oberg; Lars Adolfsson; Mats Foldevi
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  B W Koes; R J Scholten; J M Mens; L M Bouter
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Myofascial pain syndrome: a treatment review.

Authors:  Mehul J Desai; Vikramjeet Saini; Shawnjeet Saini
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2013-02-12

7.  Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute low back pain.

Authors:  Wendelien H van der Gaag; Pepijn Ddm Roelofs; Wendy Tm Enthoven; Maurits W van Tulder; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.