Literature DB >> 6440436

Permeability of latex and polyvinyl chloride gloves to 20 antineoplastic drugs.

J L Laidlaw, T H Connor, J C Theiss, R W Anderson, T S Matney.   

Abstract

Permeability of latex and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) gloves to 20 injectable antineoplastic drugs was studied. Four types of gloves were evaluated: latex surgical gloves, latex examination gloves, and PVC gloves in two thicknesses. Each glove material was exposed to each drug for 90 minutes, and permeation was tested using a mutagenicity assay. Individual fingertips of thin PVC gloves and latex surgical gloves were tested for permeability at five time points (2-30 minutes) using a doxorubicin coloration assay. All drugs permeated the thin PVC gloves. Latex surgical gloves were definitely permeable to two drugs (carmustine and thiotepa) and exhibited borderline permeability to mechlorethamine hydrochloride. The thick PVC gloves were definitely permeable to four drugs (carmustine, thiotepa, mechlorethamine hydrochloride, and daunorubicin hydrochloride) and exhibited borderline permeability to two drugs (doxorubicin and mercaptopurine). The latex examination gloves were permeable to carmustine, thiotepa, mechlorethamine hydrochloride, and cyclophosphamide. Doxorubicin permeation of individual fingertips of thin PVC gloves varied in time and amount. Doxorubicin did not permeate the latex surgical glove material, but testing with thiotepa showed that individual fingertips of this material also varied in permeability. Glove thickness was a major determinant of permeability; latex surgical gloves were the least permeable and thin PVC gloves the most permeable to the antineoplastic drugs tested. Within individual gloves and glove types, time and amount of permeation were not uniform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6440436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm        ISSN: 0002-9289


  9 in total

Review 1.  Drugs hazardous to healthcare workers. Evaluation of methods for monitoring occupational exposure to cytostatic drugs.

Authors:  P J Sessink; R P Bos
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Comparative study on protective gloves for handling cytotoxic medicines: a model study with carmustine.

Authors:  H Dinter-Heidorn; G Carstens
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1992-08-21

Review 3.  Biological safety cabinetry.

Authors:  R H Kruse; W H Puckett; J H Richardson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  The risks of handling cytotoxic drugs. II. Recommendations for working with cytotoxic drugs.

Authors:  G P Kaijser; W J Underberg; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1990-12-14

Review 5.  Applicability of the comet assay in evaluation of DNA damage in healthcare providers' working with antineoplastic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Javad Zare Sakhvidi; Mohammad Hajaghazadeh; Mehrdad Mostaghaci; Amir Houshang Mehrparvar; Fariba Zare Sakhvidi; Elham Naghshineh
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-04-25

6.  Handling cytotoxics.

Authors:  C J Williams
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-11-09

7.  Biological monitoring of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide in urine of hospital personnel occupationally exposed to cytostatic drugs.

Authors:  A S Ensslin; Y Stoll; A Pethran; A Pfaller; H Römmelt; G Fruhmann
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Detection of contamination with antineoplastic agents in a hospital pharmacy department.

Authors:  P J Sessink; R B Anzion; P H Van den Broek; R P Bos
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1992-02-21

9.  Environmental and biological monitoring of antineoplastic drugs in four workplaces in a Swedish hospital.

Authors:  M Hedmer; H Tinnerberg; A Axmon; B A G Jönsson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.015

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.