Literature DB >> 6436880

Conditioned place preference: an evaluation of morphine's positive reinforcing properties.

A Blander, T Hunt, R Blair, Z Amit.   

Abstract

The place-preference paradigm was evaluated as a measure of morphine's positive reinforcing properties. Previous place-preference studies obtained a morphine place preference of 26%-63%. In order to examine whether differences in procedure may account for this scatter, the present experiment investigated whether there is any difference in the absolute magnitude of preference when animals are conditioned on their non-preferred side of the box or when animals are randomly assigned to the side of conditioning. Furthermore, the number of conditioning days was extended with 3 intervening test days, and drug doses were doubled following each test day. The results showed no significant difference between conditioning animals on their non-preferred side or randomly assigning them to the side of conditioning. However, by extending the number of conditioning days, as well as by following the drug regimen used, the animals showed a greater magnitude of preference than that observed in previous studies. The implications of these findings for the usage of this paradigm as a measure of morphine's positive reinforcing properties are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6436880     DOI: 10.1007/bf00432040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  13 in total

1.  Morphine dependence in rats: secondary reinforcement from environmental stimuli.

Authors:  R Kumar
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1972

2.  Reinforcing effects of morphine microinjection into the ventral tegmental area.

Authors:  A G Phillips; F G LePiane
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Factors affecting voluntary morphine intake in self-maintained addicted rats.

Authors:  J R Weeks; R J Collins
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1964-10-14

4.  Dose and physical dependence as factors in the self-administration of morphine by rats.

Authors:  J R Weeks; R J Collins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Intraventricular self-administration of morphine in naive laboratory rats.

Authors:  Z Amit; Z W Brown; L S Sklar
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1976-08-17       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Reinforcing effects of brain microinjections of morphine revealed by conditioned place preference.

Authors:  D van der Kooy; R F Mucha; M O'Shaughnessy; P Bucenieks
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-07-08       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Drug reinforcement studied by the use of place conditioning in rat.

Authors:  R F Mucha; D van der Kooy; M O'Shaughnessy; P Bucenieks
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-07-08       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Rewarding and aversive effects of morphine: temporal and pharmacological properties.

Authors:  J E Sherman; C Pickman; A Rice; J C Liebeskind; E W Holman
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Dopaminergic substrates of amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning.

Authors:  C Spyraki; H C Fibiger; A G Phillips
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-12-16       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Attenuation of heroin reward in rats by disruption of the mesolimbic dopamine system.

Authors:  C Spyraki; H C Fibiger; A G Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  20 in total

1.  Drug-motivated behavior in rats with lesions of the thalamic orosensory area.

Authors:  Jennifer E Nyland; Danielle N Alexander; Patricia S Grigson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Reward Comparison: The Achilles' heel and hope for addiction.

Authors:  Patricia Sue Grigson
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Dis Models       Date:  2008

3.  Conditioning of morphine-induced taste aversion and analgesia.

Authors:  J S Miller; K S Kelly; J L Neisewander; D F McCoy; M T Bardo
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  SCH 23390 blocks drug-conditioned place-preference and place-aversion: anhedonia (lack of reward) or apathy (lack of motivation) after dopamine-receptor blockade?

Authors:  E Acquas; E Carboni; P Leone; G Di Chiara
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Repeated testing attenuates conditioned place preference with cocaine.

Authors:  M T Bardo; J L Neisewander; J S Miller
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Enhancement of conditioned preference for a place paired with amphetamine produced by blocking the association between place and amphetamine-induced sickness.

Authors:  B T Lett
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Conditioned aversion after delay place conditioning with nicotine.

Authors:  P J Fudala; E T Iwamoto
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Opiate reinforcement and naloxone aversion, as revealed by place preference paradigm, in two strains of rats.

Authors:  J Dymshitz; I Lieblich
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Novel approach to data analysis in cocaine-conditioned place preference.

Authors:  Adriane M dela Cruz; David V Herin; James J Grady; Kathryn A Cunningham
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.293

10.  Divergent effects of cannabidiol on the discriminative stimulus and place conditioning effects of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol.

Authors:  Robert E Vann; Thomas F Gamage; Jonathan A Warner; Ericka M Marshall; Nathan L Taylor; Billy R Martin; Jenny L Wiley
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 4.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.