Literature DB >> 6435085

A double-blind study comparing the effectiveness of cromolyn sodium and sustained-release theophylline in childhood asthma.

C T Furukawa, G G Shapiro, C W Bierman, M J Kraemer, D J Ward, W E Pierson.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of cromolyn sodium and theophylline on asthma in children was compared during a 3-month trial. Forty-six children (aged 5 to 15 years) with asthma were assigned at random to cromolyn or theophylline (Theo-Dur) treatment groups. Each subject received theophylline placebo or cromolyn placebo in addition to the active drugs. A methacholine challenge test was done at the start of the study to document asthma and was repeated during the third month. The theophylline dosage was regulated to obtain serum levels of 10 to 15 micrograms/mL by a physician not involved directly with patient care. Forty patients completed the study. Both theophylline and cromolyn treatment groups showed improvement from base-line status in terms of symptom scores, pulmonary function, and decreased use of inhaled albuterol. Patients treated with theophylline had more side effects and required more frequent office visits than those treated with cromolyn. Both groups had decreased sensitivity to methacholine, and for one statistical test patients treated with cromolyn improved significantly. These results indicate that cromolyn is as effective as theophylline in treating mild to moderate asthma in children; additional benefits were fewer side effects and a possible decrease in bronchial hyperactivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6435085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  13 in total

Review 1.  Oral xanthines as maintenance treatment for asthma in children.

Authors:  P Seddon; A Bara; F M Ducharme; T J Lasserson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-01-25

2.  Cost effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroid plus bronchodilator therapy versus bronchodilator monotherapy in children with asthma.

Authors:  M P Rutten-van Mölken; E K Van Doorslaer; M C Jansen; E E Van Essen-Zandvliet; F F Rutten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Newer Perspectives of Childhood Asthma.

Authors:  Keya Lahiri; Mrunalini Chavarkar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 4.  Clinical expression of bronchial hyperreactivity in children.

Authors:  C W Bierman; G G Shapiro
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1989

5.  Current state of theophylline in asthma.

Authors:  S McKenzie
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 6.  Canadian Asthma Consensus Report, 1999. Canadian Asthma Consensus Group.

Authors:  L P Boulet; A Becker; D Bérubé; R Beveridge; P Ernst
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-11-30       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Sustained release theophylline preparations. Practical recommendations for prescribing and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Authors:  A Glynn-Barnhart; M Hill; S J Szefler
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Morbidity in nocturnal asthma: sleep quality and daytime cognitive performance.

Authors:  M F Fitzpatrick; H Engleman; K F Whyte; I J Deary; C M Shapiro; N J Douglas
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Sodium cromoglycate in asthma: correlation between response and serum concentrations.

Authors:  Y Yahav; S Dany; D Katznelson; Z Farfel
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Salmeterol in nocturnal asthma: a double blind, placebo controlled trial of a long acting inhaled beta 2 agonist.

Authors:  M F Fitzpatrick; T Mackay; H Driver; N J Douglas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.