Literature DB >> 6432576

Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.

B Nestor, R B Gold.   

Abstract

The federal government and the states spent $328 million to support the provision of contraceptive services in fiscal 1982, 13 percent less than they had spent the previous year. Federal funds for family planning services came from Title X of the Public Health Service Act, Title XIX of the Social Security Act (Medicaid), and the Maternal and Child Health (MCH) and Social Services block grants, which are administered by the states. Title X continued to provide the largest, although a diminishing, share of public funds for contraceptive services--36 percent of all such funds in 1982. (In 1980, Title X had accounted for 44 percent of public funding.) Medicaid expenditures for family planning totaled $94 million; $17 million was spent under the MCH block grant, and $46 million under the Social Services block grant. State governments contributed an additional $53 million, about the same figure reported for the previous year, indicating that the states did not use their own funds to soften the impact of cuts in federal expenditures for contraceptive services in 1982. The federal government and the states spent an estimated $55 million, almost all of it through Medicaid, to provide sterilization services for poor women. The states spent $67 million and the federal government spent $1 million to provide abortions for 210,000 indigent women. These figures come from the 11th annual survey of state health and welfare agencies and state Medicaid programs by The Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI). The AGI conducted this survey in January 1983 to determine the levels and sources of public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services in each state during FY 1982.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion, Induced--cost; Abortion, Legal--cost; Americas; Contraception; Contraceptive Usage; Developed Countries; Developing Countries; Economic Factors; Expenditures; Family Planning; Family Planning Programs--cost; Fertility Control, Postconception; Financial Activities; Financing, Government; Funds; Grants; Medical Assistance, Title 19; North America; Northern America; Political Factors; Public Assistance; Social Welfare--statistics; Sterilization, Sexual--cost; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6432576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect        ISSN: 0014-7354


  2 in total

1.  Source of service and visit rate for family planning services: United States, 1982.

Authors:  W D Mosher; M C Horn
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 2.  The Economic Burden of Abortion and Its Complication Treatment Cares: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maryam Soleimani Movahed; Saeed Husseini Barghazan; Fariba Askari; Morteza Arab Zozani
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2020-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.