Literature DB >> 6432124

Age-sex registers as a screening tool for general practice: size of the wrong address problem.

A J Silman.   

Abstract

Age-sex registers were compiled and updated for the east London general practices participating in a screening study for hypertension. Of 1435 addresses in the registers of two practices that were checked, 228 (16%) were incorrect, according to the return by the post office of the screening invitations and checking the addresses of the non-responders using telephone directories and the medical records. The non-responders to the screening invitation for whom a new address was not found, were visited at the address as recorded on the age-sex register. This showed that the true address error rate from the original age-sex registers was 26% and thus substantially greater than that calculated from returned letters. It is concluded that the non-acceptance rate of screening in general practice might be exaggerated as a result of the lack of a correct address for a substantial proportion of the patients on a general practice list.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6432124      PMCID: PMC1442426          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.289.6442.415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  14 in total

1.  Estimating the point accuracy of population registers using capture-recapture methods in Scotland.

Authors:  M J Garton; M I Abdalla; D M Reid; I T Russell
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  A comparison of the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of private household and communal establishment residents in a multi-ethnic inner-city area.

Authors:  M J Commander; S Odell; S P Sashidharan; P G Surtees
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Blood pressure and migration: a study of Bengali immigrants in East London.

Authors:  A J Silman; S J Evans; E Loysen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Evaluation of the use of general practice age-sex registers in epidemiological research.

Authors:  K Walsh
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Inaccuracy of FHSA registers: help from electoral registers.

Authors:  G Bickler; S Sutton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-01

6.  Symptomatic and silent gall stones in the community.

Authors:  K W Heaton; F E Braddon; R A Mountford; A O Hughes; P M Emmett
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Attendance and non-attendance for breast screening at the south east London breast screening service.

Authors:  J McEwen; E King; G Bickler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-08

8.  Audit of preventive activities in 16 inner London practices using a validated measure of patient population, the 'active patient' denominator. Healthy Eastenders Project.

Authors:  J Robson; M Falshaw
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Survey response rates: national and regional differences in a European multicentre study of vertebral osteoporosis.

Authors:  T W O'Neill; D Marsden; C Matthis; H Raspe; A J Silman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  The cost of screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Walker; D K Whynes; J O Chamberlain; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.