Literature DB >> 6430528

The electric double layer in bone and its influence on stress-generated potentials.

S R Pollack, R Salzstein, D Pienkowski.   

Abstract

Stress-generated potential (SGP) studies in fluid-filled bone have been interpreted in terms of streaming potential theory. Variations in fluid conductivity and viscosity are in agreement with this theory. Experimental results also indicate that the zeta potential of bone is dependent upon the ion concentration of the fluid. In fact, the zeta potential is seen to reverse polarity at sufficiently high concentrations of NaCl and KCl. This observation indicates that the electric double layer at the fluid-bone matrix interface is an important region contributing to electromechanical effects in bone. The double layer may also have an effect on piezoelectric studies in dry bone since the charged species remain on the matrix after the bone specimens are dried.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6430528     DOI: 10.1007/bf02406138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  15 in total

1.  Electrophoresis of synthetic hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  S A LEACH
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1960-12       Impact factor: 2.633

2.  Theoretical evidence for the generation of high pressure in bone cells.

Authors:  R J Jendrucko; W A Hyman; P H Newell; B K Chakraborty
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Piezoelectric properties of dry and wet bone.

Authors:  J C Anderson; C Eriksson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-01       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The origin of stress-generated potentials in fluid-saturated bone.

Authors:  D Pienkowski; S R Pollack
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  The treatment of non-unions with electricity.

Authors:  C T Brighton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Dielectric permittivity and electrical conductivity of fluid saturated bone.

Authors:  J D Kosterich; K R Foster; S R Pollack
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Streaming potential and the electromechanical response of physiologically-moist bone.

Authors:  D Gross; W S Williams
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Ceramic models for piezoelectricity in dry bone.

Authors:  M W Johnson; W S Williams; D Gross
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Microelectrode studies of stress-generated potentials in four-point bending of bone.

Authors:  W Starkebaum; S R Pollack; E Korostoff
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1979-09

10.  Treatment of ununited tibial diaphyseal fractures with pulsing electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  C A Bassett; S N Mitchell; S R Gaston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  6 in total

1.  An in vivo assessment of muscular activity and the importance of electrical phenomena in bone remodelling.

Authors:  F McDonald; W J Houston
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Vital biomechanics: proposed general concepts for skeletal adaptations to mechanical usage.

Authors:  H M Frost
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  The Kroc Foundation Conference on Functional Adaptation in Bone Tissue.

Authors: 
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  Relevance of collagen piezoelectricity to "Wolff's Law": a critical review.

Authors:  Andrew C Ahn; Alan J Grodzinsky
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Membrane stretch activates a high-conductance K+ channel in G292 osteoblastic-like cells.

Authors:  R M Davidson
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.843

Review 6.  Mechanical signals as anabolic agents in bone.

Authors:  Engin Ozcivici; Yen Kim Luu; Ben Adler; Yi-Xian Qin; Janet Rubin; Stefan Judex; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 20.543

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.