Literature DB >> 6426486

Decision analysis for public health: principles and illustrations.

B J McNeil, S G Pauker.   

Abstract

Over the past decade decision analysis has been applied increasingly to choices in the domain of public health. The technique allows policy makers to examine alternative health strategies in an explicit and logical manner. Each problem yields a model in standardized form so that disparate opinions and goals can be incorporated into the policy. The most common notation uses a decision tree to represent the model. Events are separated into those requiring a choice and those occurring by chance. The relative worth or utility of each potential outcome is specified separately from the probability of its occurrence. All possible outcomes are valued on a single coherent scale, although that scale may include many different attributes. The resource costs and the public health effectiveness (in terms of quality adjusted years of life saved) are two of the potential attributes commonly used in such analyses. The use of sensitivity analyses allows one to examine how changes in soft data can influence policy decisions. In this chapter, we present some of the basic principles that underlie this technology and illustrate its application to several recent controversies.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6426486     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pu.05.050184.001031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health        ISSN: 0163-7525            Impact factor:   21.981


  4 in total

1.  Economic evaluation of vaccination.

Authors:  P Van Damme; P Beutels
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Projecting the impact of a nationwide school plain water access intervention on childhood obesity: a cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  R An; H Xue; L Wang; Y Wang
Journal:  Pediatr Obes       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  A Rapid Literature Review of Multi-Criteria Decision Support Methods in the Context of One Health for All-Hazards Threat Prioritization.

Authors:  Jiawei Zhao; Tiffany Smith; Melissa Lavigne; Cécile Aenishaenslin; Ruth Cox; Aamir Fazil; Ana Johnson; Javier Sanchez; Benoit Hermant
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-15

Review 4.  Improving the efficiency and relevance of evidence-based recommendations in the era of whole-genome sequencing: an EGAPP methods update.

Authors:  David L Veenstra; Margaret Piper; James E Haddow; Stephen G Pauker; Roger Klein; Carolyn Sue Richards; Sean R Tunis; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Michael Marrone; Jennifer S Lin; Alfred O Berg; Ned Calonge
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 8.822

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.