Literature DB >> 6424755

Negative selection of patients for dialysis and transplantation in the United Kingdom.

S Challah, A J Wing, R Bauer, R W Morris, S A Schroeder.   

Abstract

In order to understand why the United Kingdom ranks low in the treatment of end stage renal failure a questionnaire investigating knowledge of current acceptance practice for dialysis and transplantation was sent to various groups of doctors throughout the country. The questionnaire comprised 16 case histories of patients with established end stage renal failure and associated social and medical problems. In each case the responding doctor was asked to indicate whether the patient would be suitable for treatment by dialysis or transplantation or both. The questionnaire was sent to a randomly selected sample of general practitioners and non-renal consultant physicians and their responses compared with those of all the nephrologists identified in the United Kingdom. The mean number of cases rejected by both general practitioners and non-renal consultant physicians was significantly higher than the number rejected by nephrologists. The findings suggest that underreferral of patients to dialysis and transplant units contributes to the current low acceptance rate of new patients into treatment programmes in the United Kingdom.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6424755      PMCID: PMC1441425          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.288.6424.1119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  5 in total

1.  Survey of chronic renal failure in Scotland.

Authors:  D M Pendreigh; L F Howitt; A J Macdougall; J S Robson; M A Heasman; A C Kennedy; M MacLeod; W K Stewart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-02-05       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Chronic renal failure in Northern Ireland, 1968-70. A prospective survey.

Authors:  M G McGeown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-02-05       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Racial differences in the incidence of treatment for end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  S G Rostand; K A Kirk; E A Rutsky; B A Pate
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Incidence of uraemia and requirements for maintenance haemodialysis.

Authors:  R A Branch; G W Clark; A L Cochrane; J H Jones; H Scarborough
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1971-01-30

5.  Characteristics of patients referred for treatment of end-stage renal disease in a defined population.

Authors:  R A Hiatt; G D Friedman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 9.308

  5 in total
  22 in total

1.  Can we meet the real need for dialysis and transplantation?

Authors:  A J Wing
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-10-20

2.  Ageism in British renal units: a view from inside the system.

Authors:  A J Wing
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1993-11

3.  Effect of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis on a British renal unit.

Authors:  A G Morgan; R P Burden
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-10-11

4.  Picking up the tab for erythropoietin.

Authors:  R Gabriel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-02-02

5.  HIV testing in patients with end stage renal disease.

Authors:  A Stevens; J Little; S Kerr; P Kilbane; C Doherty
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-02-17

6.  The kidney in myeloma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-02-01

7.  Intraregional variation in treatment of end stage renal failure.

Authors:  M Dalziel; C Garrett
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-05-30

8.  Hemodialysis in Canada: a first-class medical crisis.

Authors:  C M Kjellstrand; H Moody
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Death or dialysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-01-19

10.  Reflections on supply-demand mismatch in dialysis services in Ontario.

Authors:  N K Choudhry; C D Naylor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.