Literature DB >> 642078

A report on the present status of undergraduate urologic teaching in medical schools and some resulting recommendations.

S N Rous, M Mendelson.   

Abstract

At the request of the Education Council of the American Urological Association a survey of urologic teaching in America's medical schools was done. The most startling and distressing finding, based upon the study of 99 medical schools, was that more than half (52 per cent) of the schools do not require any clinical exposure to urology before graduation. Suggestions are offered, based upon the documented importance of urology in the delivery of primary care, for an approach to medical school curriculum committees to mandate the return of urology as a required subject in our schools.

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 642078     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)57470-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  3 in total

Review 1.  Urology in Undergraduate Medical Education.

Authors:  Marianne Casilla-Lennon; Piruz Motamedinia
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  The gatekeeper disparity--why do some medical schools send more medical students into urology?

Authors:  Alexander Kutikov; Jason Bonslaver; Jessica T Casey; Justin Degrado; Beau N Dusseault; Janelle A Fox; Desri Lashley-Rogers; Ingride Richardson; Marc C Smaldone; Peter L Steinberg; Deep B Trivedi; Jonathan C Routh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Attitudes of GP trainees towards the training received in urology on the GP training scheme.

Authors:  E J Redmond; N P Kelly; C McCarthy; E Ní Mhurchú; H Hayes; C Flynn; D O'Shea; S K Giri; H D Flood
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 1.568

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.