Literature DB >> 6419363

Abdominal wound closure--a comparison of monofilament nylon and polydioxanone.

T Leese, H Ellis.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1984        PMID： 6419363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN： 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Review of general surgery 1984-85.

Authors:  H Ellis
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  A randomised comparison of polydioxanone (PDS) and polypropylene (Prolene) for abdominal wound closure.

Authors:  A E Cameron; C J Parker; E S Field; R C Gray; A P Wyatt
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  N C Hodgson; R A Malthaner; T Ostbye
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Polydioxanone suture in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  D A Gillatt; A P Corfield; R E May; D C Bartolo; D J Leaper
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Abdominal wound closure: a controlled trial of polyamide (nylon) and polydioxanone suture (PDS).

Authors:  D J Leaper; A Allan; R E May; A P Corfield; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.891
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.