Literature DB >> 6418688

Cost analysis of the Ohio nursing home industry.

R J Caswell, W O Cleverley.   

Abstract

This study was part of a major review of long-term care policy in the state of Ohio. The authors analyzed 1532 cost reports filed by nursing homes in 1975-1976 with the Ohio Medical Assistance (Medicaid) program. The objective was to guide policy on size (economies of scale), ownership, certification status, and reimbursement. Economies of scale were not found important: skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) offered the only evidence of operation below optimal scale, and the savings attributable to achieving optimal scale (increasing average bed size from 108 to 143) amounted to only $0.20 per patient day. Proprietary facilities were consistently less costly than voluntary or governmental facilities; however, quality measures were not available, and the largest cost differential was in direct cost where quality might be affected. Hypothesized greater efficiency in proprietary facilities could not be rejected--if accurate, the cost savings were very large ($3.92 to $9.14 per patient day for all homes together). As expected, skilled facilities were more costly than intermediate care facilities (ICFs), and the differential ($3.31 per patient day) was large enough to suggest transfer of misplaced patients. High proportional Medicaid utilization of a home tended to reduce cost, possibly because of the very low ceiling rates paid by the Ohio Medicaid program during the period of this study (1975-76 data). High utilization in general reduced average cost, presumably by spreading fixed cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6418688      PMCID: PMC1068754     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  8 in total

1.  Costs of adult day care: a comparison to nursing homes.

Authors:  W G Weissert
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 1.730

2.  Nursing home cost analysis: a case study.

Authors:  H S Ruchlin; S Levey
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 1.730

3.  Nursing homes in Massachusetts: industry in transition.

Authors:  S Levey; B A Stotsky; D R Kinloch; H S Ruchlin; W Oppenheim
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  National health expenditures, fiscal year 1976.

Authors:  R M Gibson; M S Mueller
Journal:  Soc Secur Bull       Date:  1977-04

5.  A theory of the nursing home market.

Authors:  W J Scanlon
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  Costs and cost containment in nursing homes.

Authors:  H L Smith; M D Fottler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Assessment of cost related characteristics and conditions of long-term care patients.

Authors:  S Winn
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 8.  Nursing home cost studies and reimbursement issues.

Authors:  C E Bishop
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1980
  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  A model to assess the quality-cost tradeoff in nursing homes.

Authors:  A Leiken; T R Sexton; R H Silkman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The effect of competition on nursing home expenditures under prospective reimbursement.

Authors:  J A Nyman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Excess demand and cost relationships among Kentucky nursing homes.

Authors:  M A Davis; J W Freeman
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1994

4.  Case mix for nursing home payment: resource utilization groups, version II.

Authors:  D P Schneider; B E Fries; W J Foley; M Desmond; W J Gormley
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1988-12

5.  Medicaid payment policies for nursing home care: a national survey.

Authors:  R J Buchanan; R P Madel; D Persons
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1991
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.