Literature DB >> 6412423

Antibiotic susceptibility testing: caeci caecos ducentes?

J B Woolcock, M D Mutimer.   

Abstract

Antibiotic susceptibility testing is frequently conducted by diagnostic laboratories and some clinicians rely on the information which such testing provides. In this review of the procedure the rationale for interpretation of the agar diffusion test is outlined and the factors which affect determination of zone size and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) discussed. The relationship between zone size and MIC is considered, as well as the clinical relevance of MIC breakpoints. Against this background we assess the value of disc diffusion tests for veterinary practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6412423     DOI: 10.1136/vr.113.6.125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Rec        ISSN: 0042-4900            Impact factor:   2.695


  7 in total

1.  Antimicrobial drug susceptibility of bacteria isolated from disease processes in cattle, horses, dogs and cats.

Authors:  J F Prescott; V P Gannon; G Kittler; G Hlywka
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  The value of antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Authors:  J Prescott
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Minimal inhibitory concentrations of antimicrobial agents against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae.

Authors:  J Szancer
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.310

Review 4.  Identification of veterinary pathogens by use of commercial identification systems and new trends in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of veterinary pathogens.

Authors:  J L Watts; R J Yancey
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  A 4-year survey of antimicrobial susceptibility trends for isolates from cattle with bovine respiratory disease in North America.

Authors:  J L Watts; R J Yancey; S A Salmon; C A Case
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of penicillin, oxytetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfadoxine in the treatment of acute undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease.

Authors:  G D Mechor; G K Jim; E D Janzen
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.008

7.  A comparison of trimethoprim-sulfadoxine and ceftiofur sodium for the treatment of respiratory disease in feedlot calves.

Authors:  G K Jim; C W Booker; P T Guichon
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.008

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.