| Literature DB >> 6410436 |
S P Mangen, E S Paykel, J H Griffith, A Burchell, P Mancini.
Abstract
In a prospective controlled investigation chronic patients, the majority with neurotic conditions, were randomly allocated either to community psychiatric nurses (CPN) as the main therapist or to routine out-patient psychiatrist follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean public expenditure for the two modes of care. The direct costs of psychiatric care comprised a small proportion of total public expenditure and were initially greater in the nursing group. Subsequently, and over the whole 18-month study period, nursing was the cheaper option in terms of these direct costs. Clinical and social outcomes were comparable in both follow-up groups. Consumer satisfaction was significantly greater among CPN patients. On balance, these results confirm the benefit of community psychiatric nursing for this patient group.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1983 PMID: 6410436 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291700051047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Med ISSN: 0033-2917 Impact factor: 7.723