Literature DB >> 6401574

Screening for breast cancer: how effective are our tests? A critical review.

M Moskowitz.   

Abstract

The primary goal of screening for breast cancer is to detect the disease at a smaller size and presumably earlier stage. A review of the literature is presented, which evaluates the ability of thermography, mammography, and clinical examination to lower the threshold size at detection and evaluate the predictive value of a positive test as compared with the prevalence of cancer existing in the population reported. We have found little evidence to indicate that clinical thermography lowers the stage at detection, and neither does a positive thermogram in screening seem to have a strong predictive value. Clinical examination can lower threshold over current threshold levels, but only at the expense of a very high biopsy rate. The data reported in the literature show that mammography can advance the stage at detection and have a reasonably high predictive value compared with the isoprobability baseline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6401574     DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.33.1.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin        ISSN: 0007-9235            Impact factor:   508.702


  5 in total

1.  Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Silvia Obenauer; Christian Sohns; Carola Werner; Eckhardt Grabbe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  The Stockholm breast cancer screening trial--5-year results and stage at discovery.

Authors:  J Frisell; G Eklund; L Hellström; U Glas; A Somell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Randomized mammographic screening for breast cancer in Stockholm. Design, first round results and comparisons.

Authors:  J Frisell; U Glas; L Hellström; A Somell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Improving clinical breast examination training in a medical school: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C Pilgrim; C Lannon; R P Harris; W Cogburn; S W Fletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Estimating the sensitivity of breast cancer screening--experience with the Honolulu BCDDP data.

Authors:  J S Grove; M J Goodman; F I Gilbert; G Low
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.872

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.