Literature DB >> 6400019

In vivo biocompatibility studies. V. In vivo leukocyte interactions with Biomer.

R E Marchant, K M Miller, J M Anderson.   

Abstract

A cage implant system was utilized to quantitatively and qualitatively characterize in vivo leukocyte interactions with cast Biomer. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in conjunction with cytochemical staining procedures were used to investigate the cellular events at the leukocyte/Biomer interface as well as in the inflammatory exudate over a 21-day implantation period. SEM was used to characterize leukocyte morphology on the Biomer surface and the cytochemical stains were used to differentially count leukocytes and to demonstrate intracellular alkaline and acid phosphatase activity. The results showed that the population density of leukocytes on the Biomer surface diminished with implantation time. The population density of multinucleated foreign body giant cells remained constant with time, while the numbers of nuclei per giant cell increased. The differential analysis revealed that macrophages preferentially adhered to the Biomer surface compared to other leukocytes in the exudate. The phagocytic capability of all adherent leukocytes, including giant cells, decreased with time and this corresponded to changes in leukocyte morphology observed with SEM.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6400019     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820180917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  11 in total

Review 1.  Natural responses to unnatural materials: A molecular mechanism for foreign body reactions.

Authors:  L Tang; J W Eaton
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 6.354

2.  Defensins impair phagocytic killing by neutrophils in biomaterial-related infection.

Authors:  S S Kaplan; R P Heine; R L Simmons
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Monocyte-biomaterial interaction inducing phenotypic dynamics of monocytes: a possible role of monocyte subsets in biocompatibility.

Authors:  R S Bhardwaj; U Henze; B Klein; G Zwadlo-Klarwasser; U Klinge; C Mittermayer; B Klosterhalfen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Screening of biomedical polymer biocompatibility in NMRI-mice peritoneal cavity: a comparison between ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMW-PE) and polyethyleneterephthalate (PET).

Authors:  K G Dahmen; N Maurin; H A Richter; C Mittermayer
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  Past, present, and future technologies for oral delivery of therapeutic proteins.

Authors:  Rajesh Singh; Shailesh Singh; James W Lillard
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.534

6.  Alterations in intestinal motility and microflora in experimental acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  P Leveau; X Wang; V Soltesz; I Ihse; R Andersson
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1996-10

7.  In vitro blood compatibility of heparin-immobilized polyurethane containing ester groups in the side chain.

Authors:  Meng Wan; Dong Ki Baek; Jin-Ho Cho; Inn-Kyu Kang; Kyo Han Kim
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Degradation of biomaterials by phagocyte-derived oxidants.

Authors:  K Sutherland; J R Mahoney; A J Coury; J W Eaton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Mast cells mediate acute inflammatory responses to implanted biomaterials.

Authors:  L Tang; T A Jennings; J W Eaton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Biocompatibility Evolves: Phenomenology to Toxicology to Regeneration.

Authors:  Lars Crawford; Meghan Wyatt; James Bryers; Buddy Ratner
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 11.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.