Literature DB >> 6397871

Intensive initial oral anticoagulation and shorter heparin treatment in deep vein thrombosis.

S Schulman, D Lockner, K Bergström, M Blombäck.   

Abstract

In order to investigate whether a more intensive initial oral anticoagulation still would be safe and effective, we performed a prospective randomized study in patients with deep vein thrombosis. They received either the conventional regimen of oral anticoagulation ("low-dose") and heparin or a more intense oral anticoagulation ("high-dose") with a shorter period of heparin treatment. In the first part of the study 129 patients were randomized. The "low-dose" group reached a stable therapeutic prothrombin complex (PT)-level after 4.3 and the "high-dose" group after 3.3 days. Heparin was discontinued after 6.0 and 5.0 days respectively. There was no difference in significant hemorrhage between the groups, and no clinical signs of progression of the thrombosis. In the second part of the study another 40 patients were randomized, followed with coagulation factor II, VII, IX and X and with repeated venograms. A stable therapeutic PT-level was achieved after 4.4 ("low-dose") and 3.7 ("high-dose") days, and heparin was discontinued after 5.4 and 4.4 days respectively. There were no clinical hemorrhages, the activity of the coagulation factors had dropped to the same level in both groups at the time when heparin was discontinued and no thromboembolic complications occurred. Our oral anticoagulation regimen with heparin treatment for an average of 4.4-5 days seems safe and reduces in-patient costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6397871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  8 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Anne Holbrook; Sam Schulman; Daniel M Witt; Per Olav Vandvik; Jason Fish; Michael J Kovacs; Peter J Svensson; David L Veenstra; Mark Crowther; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Audit of start of anticoagulation treatment in inpatients.

Authors:  G Tan; H Cohen; F Taylor; J Gabbay
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Anticoagulation for three versus six months in patients with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, or both: randomised trial.

Authors:  I A Campbell; D P Bentley; R J Prescott; P A Routledge; H G M Shetty; I J Williamson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-08

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin. Understanding the dose-effect relationship.

Authors:  N H Holford
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Optimal loading dose of warfarin for the initiation of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Kamal R Mahtani; Carl J Heneghan; David Nunan; Clare Bankhead; David Keeling; Alison M Ward; Sian E Harrison; Nia W Roberts; F D Richard Hobbs; Rafael Perera
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

Review 6.  Anticoagulation in venous thrombosis.

Authors:  S Schulman
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 18.000

7.  The Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapies Using Enoxaparin.

Authors:  Hun Gyu Hwang; So My Koo; Soo Taek Uh; Yang Ki Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 8.  Warfarin initiation nomograms for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Pedro Garcia; Wilson Ruiz; César Loza Munárriz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.