Literature DB >> 6397697

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): method and early clinical experiences in diseases of the central nervous system.

W J Huk, G Gademann.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has undergone a rapid development which is still continuing. In this article a survey is given of the present status of this new diagnostic tool in the evaluation of diseases of the central nervous system. When atoms with uneven numbers of protons or neutrons in a homogeneous magnetic field are tilted against the main vector of this field by a radiofrequency pulse, nuclear magnetic resonance can be observed. During the relaxation of the little dipoles back to the direction of the underlying magnetic field, a resonance signal is generated. The superposition of variable field gradients enables the scanning of sectional images in the axial, frontal and sagittal plane. The variables of H+-magnetic resonance which can be utilized for imaging are: the proton density, the relaxation times T1 (spin-lattice) and T2 (spin-spin) and flow effects. While the proton density in organic tissue fluctuates only by some 10%, the relaxation times may vary by several hundred per cent. Tissue contrast, therefore, is mainly based on relaxation times differences. The image character can also be influenced by variations of imaging parameters (i.e. repetition rate, interpulse delay, read out or echo delay) in different imaging sequences, such as the spin-echo and the inversion recovery technique. Depending on these imaging parameters T1 and T2 will contribute to the signal to a varying degree. This fact is most important for the diagnostic information of MRI. In initial clinical experiences in the diagnosis of diseases of the central nervous system, MRI has demonstrated high sensitivity in the detection of lesions (such as oedema, neoplasms, demyelinating disease), but less significance in lesion discrimination. In spinal disease the direct sagittal imaging of MRI enables MRI-myelography without contrast medium, superior to conventional myelography in many cases. For detailed evaluation of disc disease, however, the spatial resolution still has to be improved. Promising results have been obtained from flow effects. Depending on the flow velocity of blood, vessels appear white with intensive signals (slow flow) or black due to low signal intensities (rapid flow). MRI-angiography including measurement of blood flow seems possible. MRI-contrast media are not yet available for routine clinical use. Promising results have been reported on the basis of rare-earth elements, such as gadolinium Gd3+. These substances decrease T1 and T2 with subsequent increase in signal intensity. Concerning harmful side-effects of MRI, three possible sources have to be considered: the static magnetic field, the changing magnetic field, and radiofrequency heating.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6397697     DOI: 10.1007/BF01892907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  28 in total

1.  Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of syringomyelia.

Authors:  A Yeates; M Brant-Zawadzki; D Norman; L Kaufman; L E Crooks; T H Newton
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Nuclear magnetic resonance: principles of blood flow imaging.

Authors:  C M Mills; M Brant-Zawadzki; L E Crooks; L Kaufman; P Sheldon; D Norman; W Bank; T H Newton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  NMR anatomy of the brain using inversion-recovery sequences.

Authors:  D Simmonds; L M Banks; R E Steiner; I R Young
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the spine.

Authors:  M T Modic; M A Weinstein; W Pavlicek; D L Starnes; P M Duchesneau; F Boumphrey; R J Hardy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  I L Pykett; J H Newhouse; F S Buonanno; T J Brady; M R Goldman; J P Kistler; G M Pohost
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Evaluation of NMR imaging for detection and quantification of obstructions in vessels.

Authors:  L Kaufman; L E Crooks; P E Sheldon; W Rowan; T Miller
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Clinical NMR imaging of the brain: 140 cases.

Authors:  G M Bydder; R E Steiner; I R Young; A S Hall; D J Thomas; J Marshall; C A Pallis; N J Legg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Preliminary clinical results of proton (1H) imaging of cranial neoplasms: in vivo measurements of T1 and mobile proton density.

Authors:  T J Brady; F S Buonanno; I L Pykett; P F New; K R Davis; G M Pohost; J P Kistler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Recognition of lumbar disk herniation with NMR.

Authors:  N I Chafetz; H K Genant; K L Moon; C A Helms; J M Morris
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of brain tumors: measurement of T1. Work in progress.

Authors:  T Araki; T Inouye; H Suzuki; T Machida; M Iio
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Magnetic resonance imaging. Density equalizing mapping analysis of global research architecture].

Authors:  D Ohlendorf; B Schwarze; D A Groneberg; M Schwarzer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Case report of hyperacute edema and cavitation following deep brain stimulation lead implantation.

Authors:  Albert J Fenoy; Christopher R Conner; Joseph S Withrow; Aaron W Hocher
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-08-29

3.  Quantitative T1-mapping detects cloudy-enhancing tumor compartments predicting outcome of patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Andreas Müller; Alina Jurcoane; Sied Kebir; Philip Ditter; Felix Schrader; Ulrich Herrlinger; Theophilos Tzaridis; Burkhard Mädler; Hans H Schild; Martin Glas; Elke Hattingen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 4.  Advances of gold nanoclusters for bioimaging.

Authors:  Cheng Zhang; Xiaobing Gao; Wenrui Chen; Meng He; Yao Yu; Guanbin Gao; Taolei Sun
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-08-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.