Literature DB >> 6392301

The contribution of epidemiology to the study of occupational cancer.

O M Jensen, E Lynge.   

Abstract

Most chemical compounds and physical agents recognized as human carcinogens were first identified in the occupational environment by epidemiological studies. Some 2%-8% of all cancers have been attributed to occupational exposures, but the limitations of such estimates should be recognized. The use of existing medical information systems on occupational cancer for hypothesis generation may be improved by comparing the results emerging from different countries. An initiative in this direction is recommended. Clues emerging from such general systems should be submitted to further studies to test specific hypotheses concerning risk factors. Record linkage is necessary for the epidemiological study of occupational cancer. Efforts must be made towards the storage of identifiable records with information on occupation and cancer occurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6392301     DOI: 10.1007/BF00390455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  10 in total

1.  STATISTICAL STUDIES IN THE AETIOLOGY OF MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS. I. REVIEW AND RESULTS. SUPPLEMENT 174. I.

Authors:  J CLEMMESEN
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1965

2.  Tumours of the urinary bladder in workmen engaged in the manufacture and use of certain dyestuff intermediates in the British chemical industry. I. The role of aniline, benzidine, alpha-naphthylamine, and beta-naphthylamine.

Authors:  R A CASE; M E HOSKER; D B McDONALD; J T PEARSON
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1954-04

Review 3.  Environmental carcinogenesis: misconceptions and limitations to cancer control.

Authors:  J Higginson; C S Muir
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Lung cancer in Danish butchers.

Authors:  E Lynge; O Andersen; T S Kristensen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-03-05       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Lung cancer risk from formaldehyde.

Authors:  O M Jensen; S K Andersen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-04-17       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Lung cancer in butchers.

Authors:  A J Fox; E Lynge; H Malker
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-01-16       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Cancer risk from formaldehyde.

Authors:  O M Jensen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-08-30       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Chemicals, industrial processes and industries associated with cancer in humans.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum Suppl       Date:  1982-10

9.  Some industrial chemicals and dyestuffs.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum       Date:  1982-05

Review 10.  The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today.

Authors:  R Doll; R Peto
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 13.506

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Occupational risks of sinonasal cancer in Denmark.

Authors:  J H Olsen
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1988-05

Review 2.  Occupational cancer research in the Nordic countries.

Authors:  K Kjaerheim
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.031

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.