Literature DB >> 639212

Evaluation of R wave amplitude changes versus ST-segment depression in stress testing.

P E Bonoris, P S Greenberg, G W Christison, M J Castellanet, M H Ellestad.   

Abstract

Exercise ECGs and coronary angiograms were reviewed in 266 patients (81 normals and 185 with significant coronary artery disease). Thirty-three false positive and 96 false negative ST responses to stress testing were purposely chosen to determine if the R wave could reduce the number of false ST responses. R wave amplitude changes were measured in the control and in the immediate postexercise period. An increase or no change in R wave was taken as evidence of an abnormal response, while a decrease in the R wave was a normal response. The sensitivity by ST segment was 48% and the specificity was 59%. These values were low because of the large number of false positive and negative ST responses in the study. It was our purpose to determine if these lowered values could be significantly improved by the R wave. Using R wave criteria, the sensitivity was 63% (P is less than 0.01) while the specificity was 79% (P is less than 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of stress testing can be significantly improved using R wave changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 639212     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.57.5.904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  13 in total

1.  Detection of abnormality in the electrocardiogram without prior knowledge by using the quantisation error of a self-organising map, tested on the European ischaemia database.

Authors:  E A Fernández; P Willshaw; C A Perazzo; R J Presedo; S Barro
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The value of electrocardiographic R-wave changes in exercise testing: Preexercise versus postexercise measurements.

Authors:  Dennis W. Rowe; Alonzo Autrey; Carlos M. De Castro; Efrain Garcia; Robert J. Hall
Journal:  Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1981-09

3.  Dear sir.

Authors: 
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Determinants of augmentation of ECG QRS complexes and R waves in patients after hemodialysis.

Authors:  Abdenasser Drighil; John E Madias; Hanane El Mosalami; Nadia El Badaoui; Ahmed Bennis; Bahija Mouine; Wafae Fadili; Beenyouness Ramdani
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Method for the computation of an accurate zero reference for ECG signals.

Authors:  A Peper; R Jonges; C A Grimbergen; T G Losekoot; J Strackee
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  QRS Score: a composite index of exercise-induced changes in the Q, R, and S waves during exercise stress testing in patients with ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  A Toth; Z Marton; L Czopf; G Kesmarky; R Halmosi; I Juricskay; T Habon; K Toth
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.468

7.  Recording of surface His-Purkinje potentials.

Authors:  A Peper; R Jonges; T G Losekoot; C A Grimbergen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Simultaneous effects of sinusoidal whole body vibration and broadband noise on TTS2's and R-wave amplitudes in men at two different dry bulb temperatures.

Authors:  O Manninen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Symptomatic and silent myocardial ischaemia in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  S D Pringle; F G Dunn; A C Tweddel; W Martin; P W Macfarlane; J H McKillop; A R Lorimer; S M Cobbe
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-05

10.  Factors influencing R wave amplitude in patients with ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  J E Deanfield; G Davies; F Mongiadi; C Savage; A P Selwyn; K M Fox
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1983-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.