Literature DB >> 6390763

Complications of intraocular lenses. A historical and histopathological review.

D J Apple, N Mamalis, K Loftfield, J M Googe, L C Novak, D Kavka-Van Norman, S E Brady, R J Olson.   

Abstract

Recent improvements in intraocular lens (IOL) design, manufacturing techniques, and surgical techniques have greatly reduced the incidence of complications following implantation, and many authors now consider IOL implantation to be among the most safe and effective major surgical procedures. However, adverse reactions are still seen--some as late sequelae of earlier IOL designs and implantation techniques and some as sequelae of more recent implantations using "state-of-the-art" lenses and surgical techniques. Complications may be due to various factors, including surgical technique, IOL design, or the inability of some eyes with preexisting disease to tolerate an implant. The authors trace the evolution of IOLs since Ridley's first implant, summarizing the modifications in lenses and surgical techniques that were made as complications were recognized. They then review the clinical and histopathological features of selected cases from more than 200 IOLs and/or globes removed due to IOL-related complications and studied in the University of Utah Ocular Pathology Laboratory. It is hoped that this review will provide insights into the pathogenesis of IOL complications, enhancing the current success of implant procedures and stimulating further basic and clinical research in this area.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6390763     DOI: 10.1016/0039-6257(84)90113-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0039-6257            Impact factor:   6.048


  49 in total

Review 1.  The incidence, pathogenesis and treatment of cystoid macular edema following cataract surgery.

Authors:  A J Flach
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1998

2.  Intraocular lens implants. Have come a long way, but the advances are not yet available to all.

Authors:  B Allan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-08

3.  [History of the development of intraocular lenses].

Authors:  G U Auffarth; D J Apple
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Comparison of outcomes of primary and secondary implantation of scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lens.

Authors:  V Y W Lee; H K L Yuen; A K H Kwok
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  [Cloudiness of a PMMA intraocular lens. "Snowflake" degeneration].

Authors:  J M Schmidbauer; D J Apple; Q Peng; S N Arthur; L G Vargas
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Broken intraocular lens during cataract surgery.

Authors:  J N Kirkpatrick; S D Cook
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  The course of diabetic retinopathy following cataract surgery in eyes previously treated by laser photocoagulation.

Authors:  A Pollack; H Leiba; A Bukelman; S Abrahami; M Oliver
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Cataract surgery and IOL implantation. More than 40 years of personal experience. My present criteria and considerations.

Authors:  J Barraquer
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Pupillary membrane after cataract extraction with posterior chamber lens in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  A J Geerards; C T Langerhorst
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Combined penetrating keratoplasty and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in the absence of a lens capsule.

Authors:  R N Gaster; R C Troutman; H V Ong; A Draga; S C Belmont
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1990
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.