Literature DB >> 6390697

Electrical stimulation in treatment of delayed union and nonunion of fractures and osteotomies.

A W Dunn, G A Rush.   

Abstract

This study reviews the cases of 52 patients with 52 ununited fractures and osteotomies who were treated with two methods of electrical stimulation, one surgical, the other nonsurgical. Seventeen patients, 14 of whom had concomitant bone grafting, had implantation of a bone growth stimulator. There were three synovial pseudarthroses but no active infection in this group. The overall success rate in healing of the fractures was 82%. Thirty-five patients, of whom four had initial concomitant bone grafting, were treated with pulsing electromagnetic fields (PEMF). There were six draining infections but no pseudarthrosis in this group. Two nonunions healed after bone grafting was combined with PEMF treatment, when the latter alone had failed. Eighty-one percent of the fractures united, and drainage ceased in five of the six infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6390697     DOI: 10.1097/00007611-198412000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  7 in total

Review 1.  Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?

Authors:  Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; Zhihua Han; Thomas DeCoster; Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; John H Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  The electricidal effect: reduction of Staphylococcus and pseudomonas biofilms by prolonged exposure to low-intensity electrical current.

Authors:  Jose L del Pozo; Mark S Rouse; Jayawant N Mandrekar; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  The electricidal effect is active in an experimental model of Staphylococcus epidermidis chronic foreign body osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Jose L Del Pozo; Mark S Rouse; Gorane Euba; Cheol-In Kang; Jayawant N Mandrekar; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Electrical stimulation in bone healing: critical analysis by evaluating levels of evidence.

Authors:  Michelle Griffin; Ardeshir Bayat
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2011-07-26

5.  Electrical stimulation: Nonunions.

Authors:  Bauke W Kooistra; Anil Jain; Beate P Hanson
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Modulation of Osteogenesis in MC3T3-E1 Cells by Different Frequency Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Haitao Cui; Zhenxu Wu; Naipeng Wu; Zongliang Wang; Xuesi Chen; Yen Wei; Peibiao Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Translational Insights into Extremely Low Frequency Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (ELF-PEMFs) for Bone Regeneration after Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery.

Authors:  Sabrina Ehnert; Steffen Schröter; Romina H Aspera-Werz; Wiebke Eisler; Karsten Falldorf; Michael Ronniger; Andreas K Nussler
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.