Literature DB >> 6388726

Detection of liver metastases. A prospective study comparing liver enzymes, scintigraphy, ultrasonography and computed tomography.

R H Schreve, O T Terpstra, L Ausema, J S Lameris, A J van Seijen, J Jeekel.   

Abstract

A prospective comparative study between liver enzymes, scintigraphy, ultrasonography and computed tomography for detection of liver metastases was performed in 113 patients who were eligible for operation for a carcinoma in the gastrointestinal tract. Twenty-three of the 113 patients (20 per cent) had liver metastases. The accuracy of scintigraphy was 79 per cent, of ultrasonography 85 per cent and of computed tomography 88 per cent. The results of these tests showed no statistical differences. Ultrasonography and computed tomography were significantly more accurate than alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (respectively P less than 0.01 and P less than 0.05). Taking into account cost effectiveness, simplicity and patient tolerance, ultrasonography is the test of choice for the detection of liver metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6388726     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800711212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  10 in total

1.  [Transcutaneous ultrasound].

Authors:  M Hünerbein; S S Chopra; P M Schlag
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  A prospective study of six methods for detection of hepatic colorectal metastases.

Authors:  R Carter; D Hemingway; T G Cooke; R Pickard; F W Poon; J A McKillop; C S McArdle
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to detect liver metastases : a prospective trial to compare transcutaneous unenhanced and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in patients undergoing laparotomy.

Authors:  R Konopke; S Kersting; H Bergert; A Bloomenthal; J Gastmeier; H D Saeger; A Bunk
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Clinical and immunological evaluation of 20 patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with high dose recombinant leukocyte interferon-alpha A (rIFN alpha A).

Authors:  A M Eggermont; W Weimar; B Tank; A M Dekkers-Bijma; R L Marquet; J S Lameris; D L Westbroek; J Jeekel
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 6.968

5.  Sonographic diagnosis of solitary solid liver nodules in cancer patients.

Authors:  J N Bruneton; C Raffaelli; C Balu-Maestro; B Padovani; P Chevallier; M Y Mourou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Appropriateness and Economic Analysis of Conventional Circulating Biomarkers Assessment in Early Breast Cancer: A Real-World Experience from the E.Pic.A Study.

Authors:  Roberta Maltoni; William Balzi; Tania Rossi; Francesco Fabbri; Sara Bravaccini; Maria Teresa Montella; Ilaria Massa; Lucia Bertoni; Fabio Falcini; Mattia Altini
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 7.  Clinical Significance of Transient Asymptomatic Elevations in Aminotransferase (TAEAT) in Oncology.

Authors:  James H Lewis; Sophia K Khaldoyanidi; Carolyn D Britten; Andrew H Wei; Marion Subklewe
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.787

8.  Breast liver metastases--incidence, diagnosis and outcome.

Authors:  A L Hoe; G T Royle; I Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 18.000

9.  The use of duplex sonography in the detection of colorectal hepatic metastases.

Authors:  E Leen; J A Goldberg; J Robertson; G R Sutherland; C S McArdle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Acute Warfarin Toxicity as Initial Manifestation of Metastatic Liver Disease.

Authors:  Varalaxmi Bhavani Nannaka; Nihar Jani; Masooma Niazi; Dmitry Lvovsky
Journal:  Case Rep Crit Care       Date:  2016-03-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.