Literature DB >> 6385745

Nutritional rehabilitation in patients with advanced head and neck cancer receiving radiation therapy.

J M Daly, B Hearne, J Dunaj, B LePorte, B Vikram, E Strong, M Green, F Muggio, S Groshen, J J DeCosse.   

Abstract

Previous studies of nutritional support in cancer patients have applied parenteral techniques for relatively short periods. The purpose of this prospective, randomized trial was to evaluate the efficacy of long-term enteral alimentation in patients at high risk for malnutrition during oncologic treatment. Forty patients with inoperable squamous carcinoma of the nasopharynx and oropharynx were randomized to either optimal oral nutrition or to intensive nasogastric tube feedings during radiation therapy for an average of 8 weeks. Dietetic counselling and oral supplements were provided to both groups. Body weight, dietary intake, and toxicity to therapy were assessed weekly; and serum protein concentrations and anthropometric measurements were made at the time of entry, during the fourth week, at the conclusion of radiation therapy, and 1 month after radiation therapy. Tumor status was assessed at the conclusion of radiation therapy and during routine follow-up, which ranged from 9 to 39 months. The 35 evaluable patients (18 tube fed and 17 orally fed) were comparable with regard to age, disease site, and total radiation dosage, but the tube group had more stage IV patients and a greater median radiation field size. The tube fed group showed no difference in the partial tumor response rate compared with the complete tumor response rate (16 of 18 patients versus 14 of 17 patients), a slightly longer duration of response in those who had recurrence compared with those without recurrence (4.5 months versus 3.4 months) and a similar overall survival pattern to that of the orally fed group. Compared with the orally fed group, the tube fed group had a higher mean caloric intake (39 kcal/kg per day versus 30 kcal/kg per day, p less than 0.001), mean protein intake (1.4 versus 1.1 g/kg per day, p less than 0.01), and in the oropharynx cancer patients, less mean body weight loss (0.6 percent versus 6.1 percent, p less than 0.04) during treatment. The tube fed patients maintained mean mid-arm circumference and recovered mean serum albumin levels after radiation therapy in contrast with the orally fed group. Intensive outpatient tube-feeding nutritional support during radiation therapy in patients with advanced inoperable squamous cancer of the oropharynx significantly improved mean weight maintenance, mean caloric and protein intake, and mean serum albumin levels compared with patients who received optimal oral nutrition. Tumor response to radiation therapy, however, was unchanged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6385745     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90379-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  11 in total

1.  Nutritional considerations for cancer patients.

Authors:  A Chen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Nutritional support for head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shashank Garg; John Yoo; Eric Winquist
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Predictive Factors for Prophylactic Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) Tube Placement and Use in Head and Neck Patients Following Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Treatment: Concordance, Discrepancies, and the Role of Gabapentin.

Authors:  Wuyang Yang; Todd R McNutt; Sara A Dudley; Rachit Kumar; Heather M Starmer; Christine G Gourin; Joseph A Moore; Kimberly Evans; Mysha Allen; Nishant Agrawal; Jeremy D Richmon; Christine H Chung; Harry Quon
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 4.  Malnutrition and cachexia in patients with head and neck cancer treated with (chemo)radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mojca Gorenc; Nada Rotovnik Kozjek; Primož Strojan
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-03-29

Review 5.  Is enteral nutrition a primary therapy in cancer patients?

Authors:  F Bozzetti
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Nutrition intervention approaches to reduce malnutrition in oncology patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jia Li Charmaine Lee; Lai Peng Leong; Su Lin Lim
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Protein intake and muscle mass maintenance in patients with cancer types with high prevalence of sarcopenia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carolina Capitão; Diana Coutinho; Pedro Miguel Neves; Manuel Luís Capelas; Nuno M Pimenta; Teresa Santos; Antti Mäkitie; Paula Ravasco
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Translation and cross-cultural adaption of the Chinese version of the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey version 2.0: a tool for oral symptom assessment in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Min Jin; Li Sun; Rui Meng; Wenjing Wang; Rui Sun; Jing Huang; You Qin; Bian Wu; Qian Ding; Gang Peng; Tao Zhang; Kunyu Yang
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Exercise and Nutrition Interventions in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer during Curative Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Asta Bye; Jon A Sandmael; Guro B Stene; Lene Thorsen; Trude R Balstad; Tora S Solheim; Are Hugo Pripp; Line M Oldervoll
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Understanding Cachexia in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Sivaramakrishnan Muthanandam; Jananni Muthu
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2021-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.