Literature DB >> 6384455

Oral rehydration of neonates and young infants with dehydrating diarrhea: comparison of low and standard sodium content in oral rehydration solutions.

S K Bhargava, H P Sachdev, B Das Gupta, T S Daral, H P Singh, M Mohan.   

Abstract

Oral rehydration among infants aged 0-3 months has not been adequately investigated. A controlled, randomized study was thus conducted in 65 young infants hospitalized with acute noncholera dehydrating diarrhea. The study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of the standard WHO oral glucose-electrolyte solution containing 90 mmol of sodium per liter (Group A: 22 infants) with that of an oral glucose-electrolyte solution containing 60 mmol of sodium per liter (Group B: 22 infants) and with standard intravenous therapy (Group C: 21 infants). Among the 44 infants in Groups A and B, none required intravenous therapy. Dehydration, acidosis, and initial hyponatremia or hypokalemia were corrected with equal efficacy in all the three groups. In the critical first 8 h, the mean sodium absorption was significantly higher (p less than 0.01) in Group A. This resulted in hypernatremia (50%), periorbital edema (50%), mild pedal edema (27%), excessive irritability, and convulsions (4.5%). The mean serum sodium levels at 8, 24, and even 48 h were significantly higher (p less than 0.05) than those in Groups B and C. It is concluded that glucose-electrolyte oral solution containing 60 mmol of sodium per liter is as safe and effective as intravenous rehydration for the treatment of noncholera neonatal and early infantile diarrhea, while the standard WHO solution carries a significant risk of hypernatremia under similar conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6384455     DOI: 10.1097/00005176-198409000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr        ISSN: 0277-2116            Impact factor:   2.839


  11 in total

1.  Reduced-osmolarity oral rehydration salts solution multicentre trial: implications for national policy.

Authors:  R Bahl; N Bhandari; M K Bhan
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 2.  Sodium content of oral rehydration solutions: a reappraisal.

Authors:  E J Elliott; R Cunha-Ferreira; J A Walker-Smith; M J Farthing
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Guidelines for managing acute gastroenteritis based on a systematic review of published research.

Authors:  M S Murphy
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 4.  The effect of oral rehydration solution and recommended home fluids on diarrhoea mortality.

Authors:  Melinda K Munos; Christa L Fischer Walker; Robert E Black
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 5.  History and rationale of oral rehydration and recent developments in formulating an optimal solution.

Authors:  M J Farthing
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Oral rehydration in infants in developing countries.

Authors:  D Pizarro
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Oral rehydration therapy of neonates.

Authors:  H P Sachdev; S K Bhargava
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.967

8.  Evaluation of the efficacy of oral rehydration solutions using human whole gut perfusion.

Authors:  D D Rolston; S N Zinzuvadia; V I Mathan
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  Reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution for treating dehydration due to diarrhoea in children: systematic review.

Authors:  S Hahn; Y Kim; P Garner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-14

10.  Search for the ideal oral rehydration solution: studies in a model of secretory diarrhoea.

Authors:  E J Elliott; A J Watson; J A Walker-Smith; M J Farthing
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.