Literature DB >> 6382224

Comparison of nifedipine (retard formulation) and mefruside in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension--a prospective randomized double-blind crossover study in general practice.

A P Douglas-Jones, A D Mitchell.   

Abstract

Twenty-two patients under general practice care, suffering mild to moderate hypertension and receiving no active treatment had three baseline blood pressure measurements taken during a single blind 4-week placebo run-in period. One patient was secondarily excluded at this stage because of a placebo response and one patient dropped out for personal reasons. The remaining 20 patients were randomized to receive either nifedipine 20 mg twice a day or mefruside 25 mg once a day in a classical two-period crossover design with 8-week treatment periods separated by a 4-week single-blind placebo washout. During 8 weeks nifedipine therapy the mean supine blood pressure was reduced from 173 (s.d. = 15.4)/107(s.d. = 6.4) mmHg to 150(s.d. = 16.7)/93(s.d. = 10.8) mmHg whereas the corresponding reduction for mefruside was from 174(s.d. = 15.9)/107(s.d. = 9.4) mmHg to 153(s.d. = 19.1)/94(s.d. = 9.7) mmHg. Neither drug affected postural changes in blood pressure. Standing blood pressure measurements under 8 weeks nifedipine therapy fell from 172(s.d. = 12.3)/103(s.d. = 5.6) mmHg to 150(s.d. = 17.9)/94(s.d. = 10.0) mmHg with corresponding changes for mefruside being 174(s.d. = 14.7)/106(s.d. = 9.0) mmHg to 150(s.d. = 20.2)/95(s.d. = 9.4) mmHg. Since blood pressures returned to within 4% of baseline values by the end of the placebo washout period it can be inferred that each therapy was a significant (P less than 0.05 for all blood pressure variables) antihypertensive treatment in its own right.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6382224      PMCID: PMC2417958          DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.60.706.529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  5 in total

1.  ABC of blood pressure reduction. Drug treatment.

Authors:  L T Bannan; D G Beevers; N Wright
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-10-11

2.  The two-period cross-over clinical trial.

Authors:  M Hills; P Armitage
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Slow channel inhibitors verapamil and nifedipine in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  B A Gould; R S Hornung; S Mann; V Balasubramanian; E B Raftery
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.105

4.  Blood pressure reduction and vascular adaptation. A study on long-term effects of treatment with mefruside or atenolol.

Authors:  R Sivertsson; O Andersson; L Hansson
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1979

5.  Antihypertensive effects of the calcium antagonistic agent nifedipine.

Authors:  K Maeda; C Tanaka; Y Tsukano; H Minamikawa; H Komatsu; K Kotsumi; E Inoue
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1982
  5 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Nifedipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy, in ischaemic heart disease, hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  E M Sorkin; S P Clissold; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Calcium channel antagonists. Part III: Use and comparative efficacy in hypertension and supraventricular arrhythmias. Minor indications.

Authors:  L H Opie
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.727

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.