Literature DB >> 6380285

Multicenter clinical trial of cefoperazone sodium in the United States.

M S Cohen, H E Washton, S F Barranco.   

Abstract

A total of 187 physician investigators throughout the United States participated in a multicenter trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a twice daily dosage of cefoperazone sodium; 91 percent of patients received a dosage of 4 g or less of cefoperazone per day. A total of 455 patients were included in the evaluation of efficacy: 100 patients with lower respiratory tract infection; 146 patients with skin and soft tissue infection; 14 patients with osteomyelitis; 18 patients with obstetric and gynecologic infections; 84 patients with urinary tract infection; and 44 patients with bacteremia. Overall, treatment achieved a satisfactory clinical outcome in 95.3 percent of these patients. Side effects of cefoperazone were evaluated in 659 patients. Prothrombin time increased during therapy in 4 percent of patients, all but one of whom was more than 65 years old. Prothrombin time became normal with the administration of vitamin K. Diarrhea (4 or more loose stools a day) was observed in 3 percent of patients. Other adverse reactions including leukopenia, elevation of serum liver enzyme levels, and eosinophilia were mild, reversible, and typical of beta-lactam antibiotics. These results suggest that (1) twice daily administration of cefoperazone sodium can be used to treat a variety of bacterial infections caused by susceptible pathogens; (2) the adverse reactions associated with this agent at the dosage schedule employed in this trial (2 g twice a day) are predictable and limited; (3) multicenter trials of this type allow for rapid collection of data regarding safety and efficacy of new antibiotics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6380285     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(84)80094-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  9 in total

1.  Review of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use of cephalosporins.

Authors:  D Kalman; S L Barriere
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1990

2.  Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and toleration of intravenously administered cefoperazone and sulbactam when given as single agents or in combination.

Authors:  D P Reitberg; T J Whall; M Chung; D Blickens; H Swarz; J Arnold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Cephalosporins in gram-positive infections.

Authors:  J Symonds; A M Geddes
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Severe INR elevation in a patient with choledocholithiasis receiving cefoperazone.

Authors:  Hakan Alagozlu; Mehmet Cindoruk; Selahattin Unal
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 5.  Adverse effects of newer cephalosporins. An update.

Authors:  J W Thompson; R F Jacobs
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Gram-positive superinfections following beta-lactam chemotherapy: the significance of the enterococcus.

Authors:  R N Jones
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Cefoperazone versus clindamycin plus gentamicin for obstetric and gynecologic infections.

Authors:  L C Gilstrap; P J St Clair; R S Gibbs; R C Maier
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Clinical Outcomes and Adverse Effects in Septic Patients with Impaired Renal Function Who Received Different Dosages of Cefoperazone-Sulbactam.

Authors:  Chien-Hsiang Tai; Hung-Jen Tang; Chen-Hsiang Lee
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-29

9.  Cefoperazone/Sulbactam-Induced Abdominal Wall Hematoma and Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  ZhuYing Cai; Wei Yang; YingYing He; Qingge Chen; ShiQiang Wang; Xuming Luo; Xiongbiao Wang
Journal:  Drug Saf Case Rep       Date:  2016-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.