Literature DB >> 6379549

Rhinomanometry--a review.

P A Clement, C Hirsch.   

Abstract

After a short historical review, the advantages and disadvantages of the current rhinomanometric methods are discussed. In addition, the merits of spirometry or measurements of the air velocity are considered. The physics of nasal ventilation are described and the difficulty in nasal resistance measurement is studied. The different mathematical models representing nasal airflow are presented and the importance of the Broms' mathematical model is stressed.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6379549     DOI: 10.1159/000275707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec        ISSN: 0301-1569            Impact factor:   1.538


  3 in total

Review 1.  Nasal provocation.

Authors:  U Pipkorn
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1988

Review 2.  Current advances in rhinomanometry.

Authors:  K Naito; S Iwata
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.236

3.  A Prospective Population-based Study of Total Nasal Resistance in Korean Subjects.

Authors:  Se Joong Kim; Ji Ho Choi; Eun Joong Kim; Seung Ku Lee; Seung Hoon Lee; Young Joon Jun; Je Hyeong Kim; Soichiro Miyazaki; Chol Shin
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.372

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.