Literature DB >> 6379093

Mechanics, power output and efficiency of the swimming muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus).

F E Fish.   

Abstract

The surface swimming of muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus Linnaeus) was studied by forcing individual animals to swim against a constant water current, of velocity ranging from 0.2 to 0.75 m s-1, in a recirculating water channel. Lateral and ventral views of the swimming muskrats were filmed simultaneously for analysis of thrust by the propulsive appendages. Drag measurements and flow visualization on dead muskrats demonstrated that these animals experience large resistive forces due to the formation of waves and a turbulent wake, because of the pressure and gravitational components which dominate the drag force. Biomechanical analysis demonstrated that thrust is mainly generated by alternating strokes of the hindfeet in the paddling mode. A general lengthening of the hindfeet and presence of lateral fringe hairs on each digit increase the surface area of the foot to produce thrust more effectively during the power phase of the stroke cycle. Increased energy loss from drag on the foot during the recovery phase is minimized by configural and temporal changes of the hindfoot. Employing the models developed by Blake (1979, 1980a,b) for paddle propulsion, it was found that as the arc through which the hindfeet were swept increased with increasing velocity the computed thrust power increased correspondingly. However, the frequency of the stroke cycle remained relatively constant across all velocities at a level of 2.5 Hz. Both mechanical and aerobic efficiencies rose to a maximum with increasing swimming velocity. The aerobic efficiency, which examined the transformation of metabolic power input to thrust power output reached a value of 0.046 at 0.75 m s-1. The mechanical efficiency expressing the relationship of the thrust power generated by the paddling hindfeet and laterally compressed tail (Fish, 1982a,b) to the total mechanical power developed by the propulsive appendages increased to a maximum of 0.33 at 0.75 m s-1. I conclude that the paddling mode of swimming in the muskrat is relatively inefficient when compared to swimming modes which maintain a nearly continuous thrust force over the entire propulsive cycle. However, the paddling mode permits the muskrat to generate propulsive forces effectively while swimming at the surface. The evolution of this mode for semi-aquatic mammals represents only a slight modification from a terrestrial type of locomotion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6379093     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.110.1.183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

1.  Mechanical performance of aquatic rowing and flying.

Authors:  J A Walker; M W Westneat
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Preliminary data on the swimming kinematics of the Russian desman (Desmana moschata L.).

Authors:  Yu F Ivlev; A N Kuznetsov; M V Rutovskaya
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr

3.  Convergent evolution of olfactory and thermoregulatory capacities in small amphibious mammals.

Authors:  Quentin Martinez; Julien Clavel; Jacob A Esselstyn; Anang S Achmadi; Camille Grohé; Nelly Pirot; Pierre-Henri Fabre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The effect of submergence on heart rate and oxygen consumption of swimming seals and sea lions.

Authors:  T M Williams; G L Kooyman; D A Croll
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.200

5.  Swimming by sea otters: adaptations for low energetic cost locomotion.

Authors:  T M Williams
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Animal models for investigating the central control of the Mammalian diving response.

Authors:  Paul Frederick McCulloch
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Scaling of oscillatory kinematics and Froude efficiency in baleen whales.

Authors:  William T Gough; Hayden J Smith; Matthew S Savoca; Max F Czapanskiy; Frank E Fish; Jean Potvin; K C Bierlich; David E Cade; Jacopo Di Clemente; John Kennedy; Paolo Segre; Andrew Stanworth; Caroline Weir; Jeremy A Goldbogen
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Kinematic Analysis During Straight Line Free Swimming in Horses: Part 2 - Hindlimbs.

Authors:  Emma Santosuosso; Renaud Leguillette; Tatiana Vinardell; Silvio Filho; Shannon Massie; Persephone McCrae; Sarah Johnson; Campbell Rolian; Florent David
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.