Literature DB >> 6376953

Maltose absorption as an indicator of small-intestinal allograft rejection.

T R Billiar, C Garberoglio, W H Schraut.   

Abstract

Maltose and lactose absorption, which require an intact brush border for breakdown and absorption as glucose, was evaluated as a function test to monitor the integrity of the small-bowel graft. Using the rat model of accessory small-bowel transplantation, absorption tests (in the form of an oral glucose tolerance test) were performed on iso- and allografts with either portal (PP-A) or caval venous drainage (PC-A). In isografts the absorption of maltose was found to be reproducible and not influenced by the type of venous drainage. This was not the case with the use of lactose which thus was not studied further. Allografts with PC-A demonstrated a reduction in their capacity for maltose absorption on the fifth postoperative day, as the glucose peak at 30 min (T30) was significantly blunted in comparison to that for isografts with PC-A (167 mg% +/- 12 vs 204 mg% +/- 8). Functional impairment preceded histologic changes which did not arise before the sixth-to-seventh postoperative day in rats with PC-A. Allografts with PP-A absorbed maltose on the fifth postoperative day nearly as effectively as did isografts (T30 min: 185 mg% +/- 14 vs 213 mg% +/- 8). By the ninth postoperative day, the serum glucose curve after maltose administration was flattened for grafts with PC-A (T30 min: 137 mg% +/- 11) which were rejected acutely (host's death) after 11.8 days +/- 0.45. A similar impairment of maltose absorption was not seen in the PP-A group (chronic graft rejection after 22.8 days +/- 1.8) until the 15th postoperative day.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6376953     DOI: 10.1016/0022-4804(84)90164-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  10 in total

1.  Canine total orthotopic small bowel transplantation under FK 506.

Authors:  F Yoshimi; K Nakamura; Y Zhu; M Suzuki; Y Funakoshi; G Carrieri; Y Wu; H Furukawa; A J Demetris; S Todo
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Long survival in rats after multivisceral versus isolated small-bowel allotransplantation under FK 506.

Authors:  N Murase; A J Demetris; T Matsuzaki; A Yagihashi; S Todo; J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Total orthotopic small bowel transplantation in swine under FK 506.

Authors:  M Alessiani; M Spada; S Vischi; M Maestri; P Dionigi; E Arbustini; P Grossi; G B Ippoliti; M Regazzi; F De Ponti
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 4.  Small bowel transplantation.

Authors:  T J Pritchard; R L Kirkman
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Ultrastructural changes in the microvilli as a marker of small bowel rejection.

Authors:  A Yamataka; T Miyano; Y Kato; M Nozawa; K Sasaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  In situ proliferating status of mononuclear cells in rat small bowel grafts.

Authors:  M Okamoto; K Arakawa; S Fushiki
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Value of in vivo electrophysiological measurements to evaluate canine small bowel autotransplants.

Authors:  M A Meijssen; E Heineman; R W de Bruin; H J Veeze; J Bijman; H R de Jonge; F J ten Kate; R L Marquet; J C Molenaar
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Absorptive capacity of the transplanted small bowel.

Authors:  P Schroeder; E Deltz; J Seifert; F Sandforth; A Thiede
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Effect of rejection on electrophysiologic function of canine intestinal grafts: correlation with histopathology and Na-K-ATPase activity.

Authors:  I Takeyoshi; S Zhang; Y Kokudo; K Nakamura; A Ikoma; Y Zhu; T E Starzl; S Todo
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.533

10.  Recovery of allografted small intestine function.

Authors:  Z W Jiang; J S Li; N Li; Y S Li; F L Liu; X Q Sheng; Y M Cheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 5.742

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.