Literature DB >> 6375622

Diagnostic advances v the value of the autopsy. 1912-1980.

L Goldman.   

Abstract

Between 1912 and 1980, many English language publications analyzed the correlation between clinicians' diagnoses and postmortem examinations. Surprisingly, the percentage of cases with undiagnosed principal underlying diseases or primary causes of death has not diminished during this period. The autopsy's unvarying percentage yield does not indicate a lack of progress, however, since bacterial pneumonia, hepatic cirrhosis, and common tumors were missed routinely in earlier eras but were rarely missed after 1970. Pulmonary embolism remains commonly missed, but the striking recent finding is the emergence of fungal and other systemic infections that were rarely noted in prior eras. Progress in diagnosis and treatment may allow patients to live longer and new or obscure diseases may develop that will often be missed clinically. An appropriately high autopsy rate will be required if medical progress is to continue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6375622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  15 in total

1.  Death of the teaching autopsy.

Authors:  Gregory O'Grady
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-04

2.  Is autopsy dead in the ICU?

Authors:  A Esteban; P Fernández-Segoviano
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Trends of accuracy of clinical diagnoses of the basic cause of death in a university hospital.

Authors:  M H C Grade; S Zucoloto; J K Kajiwara; M T P Fernandes; L G F Couto; S B Garcia
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Comparison of clinical and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Calliope Maris; Benoît Martin; Jacques Creteur; Myriam Remmelink; Michael Piagnerelli; Isabelle Salmon; Jean-Louis Vincent; Pieter Demetter
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Factors predicting cases with unexpected clinical findings at necropsy.

Authors:  I A Robinson; N J Marley
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Death certification: increased clinical confidence in diagnosis and lack of interest in confirmation by necropsy is not justified.

Authors:  B Karwinski; F Hartveit
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Assessing the autopsy.

Authors:  P N Nemetz; J Ludwig; L T Kurland
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 8.  Autopsy and medical education: a review.

Authors:  R Charlton
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  A study of patients referred from A&E for coroners post-mortem.

Authors:  I G Kendall; S M Wynn; D N Quinton
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1993-06

10.  Correlation between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in a community hospital.

Authors:  J Gough
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1985-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.