Literature DB >> 6375274

Analgetic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. A controlled clinical comparison of morphine, nicomorphine and pethidine.

J R Nielsen, K E Pedersen, C G Dahlstrøm, B L Nielsen, B Secher, T Johansen, L F Gram.   

Abstract

In a randomized double-blind study with flexible dosage, morphine, nicomorphine and pethidine were compared with regard to analgetic effect, dose requirements, dose intervals and adverse reactions. A total of 275 patients were included, and 28 patients were excluded due to adverse reactions (n = 16) and for practical reasons, etc. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was diagnosed in about 60% of the patients, and about 30% had ischemic heart disease without AMI. All three analgesics provided equally efficient pain relief in relative doses of morphine 10, nicomorphine 10 and pethidine 75 mg/ml. Severe adverse reactions were few (allergy 3 cases, respiratory insufficiency 4, severe bradycardia 4), whereas nausea was recorded in 20-30%, vomiting in 5-15% and dizziness in 10-30% of the patients, with no difference between the three drugs. Significant blood pressure drop (greater than 30 mmHg) was seen in 3-8% of the patients, with no significant differences between the drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6375274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Med Scand        ISSN: 0001-6101


  2 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of pain in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Herlitz; A Hjalmarson; F Waagstein
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1989-01

Review 2.  Analgesia in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Herlitz
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 9.546

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.